THE REMEDIAL HERSTORY PROJECT: THE OTHER 50% OF HISTORY CLASS
  • Home
    • About RHP
    • Contact and Consulting
    • Testimonials
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
    • Our Guests
    • Apply to Speak
    • Sponsor Our Work
  • Store
  • Lessons
    • Submit a Lesson Plan
    • Buy Our Lessons
    • K-6 Lessons
    • 7-12 Lessons Dashboard >
      • World History
      • United States Women's History >
        • Early American History: Cultural Encounters
        • The Revolutionary Era: Women's Liberties?
        • The Antebellum Era: Abolition is Women's Ticket
        • The Civil War Era: Women Supporters, Soldiers, and Spies
        • Reconstruction: And Woman Suffrage
        • Industrialization and Imperialism: Women Laborers
        • The Progressive Era: Women's Causes
        • The World War I Era: Woman Suffrage
        • The New Woman Era: Roaring
        • The Great Depression Era: Women Making Do
        • The World War II Era: Women and the War Effort
        • The Post-War Era: Contradictions for Women
        • The Civil Rights Era: And Sexual Freedoms
        • The Feminist Era: Women Redefining Norms
        • The Modern Era: Post Feminism?
  • Resources
    • OTD Calendar
    • Women
    • Blog >
      • About the Blog
      • Blog
    • Reading
    • Feature Films
    • Book Club
    • YouTube
  • Summer Retreat

Remedial Herstory Blog

Support Our Work at Patreon

The Definition of History is Rigged to Exclude

7/11/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
​In my secondary history classroom, I always start the year with the question, “What is history?” On the surface this is a straightforward question. Most students respond, “the study of the past.” But what is the past? When an event happens to all people agree on how it played out? History was once current events. How many different perspectives are there in current events? The same is true in history. Is it possible to know what truly happened or what it felt like to be there? There could be as many histories as there are human witnesses. History has been written by victors, suppressing the story of the losers, therefore it has not been a truthful account of what happened, but rather the dominating account. History is also the study of the written record. Given that most of human history women were overwhelmingly illiterate, denied opportunities to record or publish, the method of historical knowing, denies women a space. Most importantly, history puts emphasis on spheres of public life that women were barred from: politics, economics, and the military. If emphasis were put on the family, medicine, and food, women would dominate history. The choice of emphasis is fundamentally exclusive of women. ​Good history is derived consensus of what happened based on evidence. And, as more evidence comes forward, the history changes. History is a moving target. It is alive. It is ever changing.


Read More
0 Comments

The Eckert Test

7/9/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
In 1985 a woman named Alison Bechdel wrote a comic strip satirizing how few women appear as major characters, and appear to have lives, in movies. The immediate result was something nicknamed the Feminist Movie Test, or the Bechdel Test. Here it is: a film has to have at least two, named women in it, who talk to each other at some point, about something besides a man [1]. That’s it: two women who exist and talk about stuff. The bar for feminism in film is barely off the ground and yet sadly few films pass the test. Every one of my favorites failed miserably. When  I first learned about the test, the only film I showed in my history courses that passed the test was Iron Jawed Angels, a film about women’s suffrage. Thankfully today there are more options for history teachers.

This test helped raise awareness of gender discrimination in the industry and created a rich national dialog about the absence of women of substance in the media. If women barely exist in the films, don’t have friends or meaningful conversations outside of men, what conclusions will children draw about women? It wouldn’t be a far cry to suggest they might conclude that girls don’t think about important things and are only interested in men. 

Watching your favorite show or film exposes you to some of the toxic stereotypes about women, most notably that they exist to serve men, don’t have female friends, and don’t have speaking roles.[2] These stereotypes are fueled by an industry dominated by male producers, directors, screen writers, and agents. Hopefully our students can distinguish that films are not real life, but sadly history, or at least the way it’s taught, would not pass the Bechdel test.

Saddened by how many times I fail to bring a female perspective into my own lessons, I've created the Eckert Test to hold myself and hopefully others to the standard of including the other 50% of the population in the history classroom. The test is this:

      Tokenism: One feminine perspective on the topic or inquiry is presented.
      Feminist: Two or more differing feminine perspectives on the topic or inquiry are presented. 
      Intersectional Feminist: Two or more differing feminine perspectives on the topic or inquiry are     
                      presented AND speakers come from different racial, ethnic, religious, economic, or
                      sexual viewpoints.

Someday when the voices of women are not at such a deficit in the classroom, half the sources students read should be half. Women are not an interest group: they are half of humanity! Women do not agree, are diverse, and have been present in one way or another throughout history. Women were the mothers, sisters, daughters, and wives of some of the greatest characters in our world history. In order to better understand those people and events, we need to hear from multiple female perspectives.

If you're a teacher and you're not sure how to do this, you are not alone. Most of my lessons are token lessons. The lessons page of this website pulls together resources from around academia to help you. Further there are so many things you could do in your classroom right now. For example, I have an awesome lesson from the Stanford History Education Group that I use to show that Black leaders around the turn of the 20th century disagreed on the best ways to uplift the race. The problem with this lesson is that it's sexist. There are no female voices in it. The lesson pits Booker T. Washington a man formerly enslaved, against W.E.B. Dubois a man from Massachusetts who was the first black man to graduate from Harvard. Both men were founders of the NAACP. To make this lesson less sexist, and to expose students to a more Black characters from history, I found a primary source from a female founder of the NAACP: Ida B. Wells (if you don't know her, here's a link to read about this incredible woman). She was a radical reformer who wanted change yesterday. Her perspective added more to the conversation. In this lesson, the three characters now present are relatively education and wealthy, perhaps an impoverished, non-NAACP member would provide a more full picture for future lessons. 

If you're not a teacher, I challenge you to find the voices of women where ever you get your news and information. Women are leading experts in every field. Allow them to weigh in on the voices that matter to you. Also know that if your history curriculum did not include primary sources from feminine perspectives, it was missing half the story.

[1]Alison Bechdel. "Bechdel Test Movie List." 2020. https://bechdeltest.com/.
[2] Jocelyn Nichole Murphy. "The role of women in film: Supporting the men -- An analysis of how culture influences the changing discourse on gender representations in film." 2015. Journalism Undergraduate Honors Theses. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jouruht/.

Read More
0 Comments

We aren't teaching history well.

7/8/2020

0 Comments

 
​I was sitting in the sun outside my favorite coffee shop on Main Street, the awning providing just enough shade from the summer heat. I had, like I usually do, my books splayed out over the small circular coffee street table, dubiously balancing on the uneven sidewalk. Every once and a while a breeze would catch on the tall shops that lined the road and whip down, sending my pages, labels, notes scribbled on scrap paper into momentary chaos.
Summer, for public school social studies teachers is time to both rejuvenate through relaxation and outdoor activity and hone our craft. For me, this has meant reading. I teach at a small school, so in my short time I’ve taught every subject we offer in the social studies. Needless to say, there is always more I can learn to bring to my classroom. I usually pick one book for each subject and then a couple for fun.
On this particular summer day, I was diving into two new books on world and US history: America’s Women by Gail Collins, and A Women’s History of the World by Rosalind Miles. These books were the first survey’s in women’s history, which was strange because I teach history and have already read substantially on both US and world history. My friends or family would not find it all surprising that I’d chosen these books to read, and honestly given my interest and numerous thesis papers in both college and graduate school on women’s history, I didn’t think I would glean much from these books. At best I hoped I’d learn about a couple women other than queens, civil rights leaders, and suffragists I didn’t know who had impacted history. I believed, like most people do, that few women had tapped into the glass ceiling and made a mark worthy of a historical footnote.

Read More
0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    16th Century
    Barriers To Women's History
    Caroline Taylor
    Historiography
    Kelsie Eckert
    Pedagogy
    Reformation
    World History

    About

    ​The history curriculum in schools is insufficient in their representation of women’s contribution to past events. This blog aims to address that. While teachers want to include women’s history, they have not had access to the training, modeling, and resources to do it effectively. Women make up fifty percent of the global population, and yet are in a small fraction of events discussed in school. Women’s choices have been harrowing, infamous, and monumental, and yet their stories are so rarely associated with mainstream history. Ask your average high school graduate, or even college graduate, to name 20 significant men in history and the list flows easily. Ask that same person to name 20 women and the names drag, if they come at all. This case in point leaves us with conclusions like, “women did not do as much” or “women’s stories were not recorded.” These assertions justify our own indifference to the history of half the human race, and could not be further from the truth.

    The flaws and impact of how we teach history are many. Women often get summarized in history in vague terms of their roles, rights, or responsibilities, and individual women are rarely mentioned. Never will you see a section in a history book where men are generalized in this way. If we were to generalize gendered behaviors, it is clear that human qualities such as powerful, innovative, and disruptive regularly make the books. Not surprisingly, feminine qualities of compassion, maintaining, and healing do not make the books as these are often grassroots ideals and are not as easily taught in hisotry. These self-effacing qualities doom women to being underrepresented, yet can you imagine a world without them? And further, when women’s actions have all the hallmarks of history, somehow their accomplishments still don’t make the cut, or do so with the caveat of “for a woman” tacked on.

    We study history to learn from our past. Girls have been denied the opportunity to fully learn about women’s struggles and triumphs in schools. Public history teachers, like myself, are stuck in a cycle because we never learned women’s history either  . We have failed to mend the errors of our own educations, and are continuing to regurgitate these errors to our students.

    Archives

    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

We ask what happened to the women? And put them in.

Our mission is to provide educators with ready-to-use inquiry-based lesson plans on women's history, which is why all our lessons, the podcast, and videos are free. Consider donating to RHP to support the production of new lesson plans and videos. 
Become a Patron
About RHP
​Employment
Terms and Conditions
Listen on Google Podcasts
  • Home
    • About RHP
    • Contact and Consulting
    • Testimonials
  • Podcast
    • Episodes
    • Our Guests
    • Apply to Speak
    • Sponsor Our Work
  • Store
  • Lessons
    • Submit a Lesson Plan
    • Buy Our Lessons
    • K-6 Lessons
    • 7-12 Lessons Dashboard >
      • World History
      • United States Women's History >
        • Early American History: Cultural Encounters
        • The Revolutionary Era: Women's Liberties?
        • The Antebellum Era: Abolition is Women's Ticket
        • The Civil War Era: Women Supporters, Soldiers, and Spies
        • Reconstruction: And Woman Suffrage
        • Industrialization and Imperialism: Women Laborers
        • The Progressive Era: Women's Causes
        • The World War I Era: Woman Suffrage
        • The New Woman Era: Roaring
        • The Great Depression Era: Women Making Do
        • The World War II Era: Women and the War Effort
        • The Post-War Era: Contradictions for Women
        • The Civil Rights Era: And Sexual Freedoms
        • The Feminist Era: Women Redefining Norms
        • The Modern Era: Post Feminism?
  • Resources
    • OTD Calendar
    • Women
    • Blog >
      • About the Blog
      • Blog
    • Reading
    • Feature Films
    • Book Club
    • YouTube
  • Summer Retreat