15. Women and World War I
The significant roles women played during World War I implored Americans to take a hard look at gender equality. Cultural norms were shifting to allow women into sport and to give them more options in acceptable social expression. The contributions and sacrifices made by women during this time ignited the demand for social change, which ultimately led to the ratification of the 19th Amendment.
How to cite this source?
Remedial Herstory Project Editors. "15. WOMEN AND WORLD WAR I." The Remedial Herstory Project. November 1, 2025. www.remedialherstory.com.
The significant roles women played during World War I implored Americans to take a hard look at gender equality. Cultural norms were shifting to allow women into sport and to give them more options in acceptable social expression. The contributions and sacrifices made by women during this time ignited the demand for social change, which ultimately led to the ratification of the 19th Amendment.
Join the Club
Join our email list and help us make herstory!
Women's Peace Party
At the start of the war in Europe, America declared its neutrality, intending to stay safe on its side of the Atlantic. As media outlets reported the high casualties, many Americans supported this decision; some aggressively so, like the Woman’s Peace Party.
Earlier peace efforts and organizations had often underrepresented women or kept them from leadership roles. Yet, within a month of the start of WWI in 1914, the Women's Peace Parade featured 1,500 women marching down NYC’s 5th Avenue. They marched silently, wearing all black, as a reminder of the mourning women nationwide would face if their country involved their sons, husbands, or fathers in this war.
After the march, seventy-year-old veteran of the Women’s Suffrage Movement, Fanny Garrison Villard, organized the group into a permanent organization. She also linked the group with key figures of women’s organizations like Carrie Chapman Catt, president of NAWSA, to prove to American women across the board that war should be avoided. They would also send delegates to the 1915 Congress of Women in Europe who sought their own resolution to the war.
Despite the best efforts of this group and others like it, peace did not come right away, nor could American neutrality last forever. By the end of 1916, it was clear that America was edging closer to war.
Thousands of Americans joined the American Preparedness Movement in preparation for America’s eventual entry for the war, with many of America’s women supporting them. At the same time, anti-war groups met regularly with President Wilson to continue to try and convince him that America had her own issues to tend to.
In 1917, the United States Congress voted to declare war on Germany. As President Wilson sought to rally the nation to the cause of war, the divisions between those who questioned America’s role in the European conflict continued, those who supported a more robust US military presence in foreign affairs, and those who advocated an end to all armed conflict continued.

Women’s Peace Parade, Public Domain
Gold Star Mothers
Despite many not agreeing with their stance of peace, the women-led peace organizations were correct in their depiction of mourning that Americans would soon face. European families had been facing losses for years and now American families were feeling that pain as the casualty lists began to grow.
Families recognized the service of their loved ones by displaying a blue banner out of their windows, and if that soldier lost their life, a gold star was added. President Wilson opposed the public reminder that American men were dying in the service, concerned it might fuel divisions in the country. However, he did support the more personal symbol of black armbands with a gold star worn by mothers and wives who had a family member who died in the military service to the United States.
It was Grace Darling Seibold in the decade after the war that united the Gold Star Mothers and convinced the federal government to finance their trips to Europe to visit their sons’ graves. The Gold Star Mothers organization still exists today to support families whose sons and daughters are lost in the military service.

Beatrice McDonald, Public Domain
Women Volunteer Corps
It would not only be men who made families worry and mourn. Even while America was still neutral, many Americans made their way to Europe as volunteers. Men joined the armies of Europe, and hundreds of American women served in military hospitals, attempting to tackle the horror of industrial war. Within a month of America declaring war, American nurses and doctors would be the first servicemembers to arrive in Europe. Over 20,000 American women would serve in foreign hospitals, though that number would have been significantly higher if African American and immigrant women were not rejected. Surprisingly, however, Indigenous women were allowed to serve as nurses. For instance, Edith Monture, pictured below on the right, volunteered with the U.S. Army Nurse Corps and served in France. Additionally, the Red Cross’s number of volunteers who remained mostly stateside, rose over eight million.
Nurses serving in the war were meant to be safe from the horrors of combat, but in an effort to save as many lives as possible, many agreed to work closer and closer to the front lines. One American woman, Beatrice MacDonald, was so close to the front lines that she took shrapnel from an artillery blast that left her with only one eye. She refused to go home, and served until the very end of the war, earning herself the Distinguished Service Cross.
Women were also recruited into the military in order to free men up for the battlefield. This would include some nurses, but women joined the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps as drivers, telephone and radio operators, clerical workers, laborers, and more. By the end of the war, 11,000 women had joined the Navy, over 7,000 women applied to the Army, and over two hundred were sent overseas as radio and telephone operators, and over 300 women would join the Marine Corps. Some left the war highly decorated, including Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee, who was chief of the Navy Nursing Corps and was the first woman awarded the Navy Cross. This award is only surpassed by the Medal of Honor in its esteem.
As with nurses, women were kept from combat, but not from risk. Six hundred women lost their lives serving in World War I.
The Rise of Home Economics
During WWI, women were also found in the burgeoning field of Home Economics. Home Economics was a field of vocational study that focused on applying scientific principles to the running of a household. Initially developed by scientists and activists in the late 1800s, home economics shifted over the decades from an educational movement that sought to professionalize women’s labor in the household to a consumer education program during the heyday of American post-war consumerism after WWII.
As a field, home economics has a long history. It was initially championed by suffragists such as Catherine Beecher (sister of Harriet Beecher Stowe) and Mary Beaumont Welsh in the late 1800s. However, it is Ellen Swallow Richards who takes the title of the founder of Home Economics. Born in Massachusetts in 1842, Richards was an engineer and a chemist. She had studied at Vassar and received her BA and MA before being the first woman admitted to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she graduated with a M.Sc. in 1873. She became MIT’s first female instructor when she accepted the job of (unpaid) chemistry lecturer.
In her professional life, she was interested in applying scientific principles to the home, such as considering the chemistry that underlies nutritional science. You can see the basis of Home Economics in the natural sciences in the definition that she and her colleagues settled on in the 4th Lake Placid Conference for home economics:
-
Home economics in its most comprehensive sense is the study of the laws, conditions, principles and ideals which are concerned on one hand with man's immediate physical environment and on the other hand with his nature as a social being, and is the study especially of the relation between those two factors;
-
In a narrow sense the term is given to the study of the empirical sciences with special reference to the practical problems of housework, cooking, etc.
Subsequently, Richards would go on to found the American Home Economics Association and take the role of its first President. Home economics would prove to be a professional field almost exclusively available to women, where their presumed expertise over the home helped legitimize their scholarly and vocational pursuits.
By WWI, home economics was a field on the brink of expansion. In 1914 and 1917, acknowledging the need for greater vocational training, the U.S. Congress passed the Smith-Lever Act and the Smith-Hughes Act, which allocated federal funds for education in agriculture, trades and industry – including homemaking. These funds were used to expand home economics courses across the country. It is notable that of all the vocational fields listed, only homemaking was singled out for women and girls.
After WWI, the fate of home economics would rise and fall. In the 1930s and 40s young women home economists were recruited into public service under F.D.R.’s New Deal programming. Especially during the Great Depression and World War II, home economists traveled through rural America to teach farm women how the latest science and technologies could improve their lives. However, at this time, corporations also saw the appeal of home economics. Home economists working in the public interest focused on consumer education while home economists hired by corporations helped companies market their products to homemakers. By the 1960s home economics courses were taught to both boys and girls, as second-wave feminism focused on equality in the workforce.

Ellen Swallow Richards, Public Domain
Culture of the Early 20th Century
Twentieth century popular culture in the US was characterized by myriad fads, fashions, innovations, and inventions that affected the lives of women. What women wore, how they danced, how they participated in the consumer economy, cared for their families, and even challenged society’s norms were all critical elements of the culture of everyday life. Their lives were separated by barriers of race, geography, or class, but American women, nevertheless, defined the popular culture of the century as participants, critics, and innovators.
American women faced the dawn of the twentieth century in clothing that artificially emphasized female curves while completely covering their bodies. Fashion of the day required full length skirts, a tightly cinched waist line, and hats with plumage. Even working-class women tended their machines or did piecework at home in floor length dresses. The creation of the shirtwaist dress provided some relief from the demands of tight lacing but nevertheless fulfilled the demands of modesty that kept women almost completely covered. A full length dress made riding the popular two-wheeled bicycle difficult. Designers met the challenge with a so-called safety bicycle for women that offered room for stylish but voluminous skirts. Even suffragists who engaged in radical protests and marches for the vote in 1919 were properly covered head to toe in white. And women who sought relief from hot summers with a day at the beach entered the water covered from shoulder to knee in bathing suits that resembled those of their male counterparts.
While beauty and fashion industries were largely dominated by men, women carved out space for themselves by filling the demand in markets that male designers and beauticians ignored. Martha Matilda Harper founded the Harper Hair Parlour and is credited with inventing modern retail franchising. Harper trained women to open salons under her brand, following her guidelines, which led to the establishment of over 500 Harper salons worldwide by the 1920s. Additionally, she invented the reclining shampoo chair, now a staple in hairdressing. Florence Nightingale Graham, known as Elizabeth Arden, was a Canadian cosmetic entrepreneur who founded Elizabeth Arden, Inc. Throughout the first half of the 20th century, she built a renowned cosmetic brand and helped make makeup socially acceptable for all women. Arden traveled to Paris to study beauty techniques and developed a range of rouge and powders that sold worldwide. Josephine Esther Mentzer, known as Estée Lauder, co-founded the Estée Lauder Companies and became one of the 20th century's most influential businesswomen. Starting with just four products, she built a multinational corporation that now owns 28 beauty companies.
Mainstream culture dictated a largely white definition of beauty, and women of color began claiming spaces in those unmet markets. Sarah Breedlove, known as Madam C.J. Walker, was an American businesswoman who became the first female self-made millionaire in the United States. In the early 1900s, she developed and marketed a line of beauty and hair products for Black women, initially selling door-to-door. She trained women to become "beauty culturists," teaching them hair grooming and styling techniques. Walker's business grew to include a factory, hair salon, beauty school, and sales network. Her success provided significant opportunities for women, particularly women of color, at a time of severe discrimination.
Dolls have always been an interesting reflection of the values that society has placed on women, but also a space where women can project the world in the way that they want to see for themselves. During World War I, when porcelain became scarce due to embargos on Germany, Bertha "Beatrice" Alexander Behrman, also known as Madame Alexander crafted her first doll. With her sisters, she sewed various cloth dolls, which saved the family's business. After the war, they continued producing cloth dolls but also made plastic and eventually porcelain dolls. Their dolls were supposed to look accurate to the way people looked. She meticulously researched the history and cultures of different places to make accurate portrayals. Due to her marketing and innovation, Alexander was a leader in the doll making industry, becoming the largest in the country for a time.

Elizabeth Arden (Florence Nightingale Graham), Public Domain
Early Women's Sports
The sports world was another matter. The prevailing belief was that feminine women – “true” women – should not exert themselves because exertion was considered manly, this belief relegated wartime women to more domestic wartime responsibilities. Women first needed to dismantle the arguments that sports, even just watching sports, made them manly. Of course, enslaved women and freed women servants of color were not treated like “ladies” in this way. In the early twentieth century, the only sports women were permitted to participate in were “aesthetic” sports like gymnastics, which was very different from the gymnasts today, and perceived as a sport that didn’t require women to exert themselves too much.
In the late 1880s, the modern bicycle was invented and, as Susan B. Anthony said, “Let me tell you what I think of bicycling. I think it has done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world. It gives women a feeling of freedom and self-reliance. I stand and rejoice every time I see a woman ride by on a wheel…the picture of free, untrammeled womanhood.” Bicycles were new toys to men, but were viewed as a vehicle for autonomy and self-reliance for women. They were liberating! Bicycles allowed women to leave home and to wear clothing that enabled involvement in more physical activity. This social shift was a necessary first step toward women’s full participation in sport.
Still, traditional gender norms persisted and the backlash was strong. Doctors and social commentators went out of their way to justify their belief that women should not exercise. In fact, a medical diagnosis of “Bicycle Face,” or the “the unconscious effort” required to keep one’s balance, which produces a “wearied and exhausted 'bicycle face.’” Beyond this nonsense, they argued that biking was taxing and inappropriate for women because it could lead to a number of health conditions including insomnia, heart problems, and depression. Rules were imposed on women cyclists, not men. In 1895, The New York World insisted on forty-one rules for women riders in order to keep them ladylike including to take assistance from male riders and not to emulate the more aggressive riding posture of male cyclists.
It took female medical doctors pushing back to end the absurdity. In 1897, Dr. Sarah Hackett Stevenson wrote in a medical journal that bicycling “is not injurious to any part of the anatomy, as it improves the general health. I have been conscientiously recommending bicycling for the last five years… The painfully anxious facial expression is seen only among beginners, and is due to the uncertainty of amateurs. As soon as a rider becomes proficient, can gauge her muscular strength, and acquires perfect confidence in her ability to balance herself and in her power of locomotion, this look passes away.” Still, emphasis for women’s sports remained on aesthetics. The modern Olympics returned in 1896, but women were not allowed to compete. Women competed for the first time at the Paris Games in 1900 representing only 22 of 997 athletes present. Women competed in tennis, sailing, croquet, equestrianism, and golf. Golfer Margaret Abbott was the first American woman to win at an Olympic Game. Abbott received a porcelain bowl as a prize.
The 1904 Games were held in St. Louis, Missouri. Matilda Scott Howell won three gold medals, becoming the first American woman to win one. Archery was the only legitimate event women were permitted to participate in. It is important to note, however, that these achievements for women were limited to white women. During this time, Ku Klux Klan membership was increasing and incidents of lynching persisted. As a result, very few tennis courts or public pools were accessible to black athletes, whether male or female. After all—black bodies, like female ones, have a long history of being policed.
Women had to dismantle the social ideology that sport was inherently a male arena and that athleticism was synonymous with and essential to health. This pertained quite literally to bans on women even sitting in stadiums. Women sports fans protested their exclusion from stadiums. Perhaps the most famous American sports song ever is “Take Me Out to the Ball Game,” sung at baseball games everywhere. This song’s original 1908 verses and lyrics read as follows:
“Katie Casey was baseball mad,
Had the fever and had it bad.
Just to root for the home town crew,
Ev’ry sou Katie blew.
On a Saturday her young beau
Called to see if she’d like to go
To see a show, but Miss Kate said “No,
I’ll tell you what you can do:
Take me out to the ball game,
Take me out with the crowd;
Just buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack,
I don’t care if I never get back.
Let me root, root, root for the home team,
If they don’t win, it’s a shame.
For it’s one, two, three strikes, you’re out,
At the old ball game.
Katie Casey saw all the games,
Knew the players by their first names.
Told the umpire he was wrong,
All along,
Good and strong.
When the score was just two to two,
Katie Casey knew what to do,
Just to cheer up the boys she knew,
She made the gang sing this song:
Take me out to the ball game….”
The song was and is a feminist anthem, imploring listeners to allow women into the sporting arena. Societal objections and false concerns about women’s health also played a role in women’s continued exclusion from sport, especially in track and field. So-called “experts” believed track could negatively affect women’s endocrine systems. Women were advised against participating during menstruation due to fears of uterine damage, and the emotional stress of competition was falsely seen as potentially leading to nervous breakdowns. Nevertheless, women remained eager to compete.

Margaret Abbott plays in the 1900 Olympic Games women's golf event in Compiegne, France, Public Domain

“Take me out to the Ball Game,” 1910, Public Domain
Impact of Culture and War on Suffrage
The National Parks Service may have articulated this best when they wrote: “The Service of American women at war cost them more than just the burden of putting their lives on hold, deferring marriage and children, or pursuing higher education. The sacrifice of these women went far beyond that; in all more than six-hundred of these patriotic women lost their lives in service to their nation. The question was, how would the nation return that debt?”
This question is fitting, as America still denied women basic rights of citizenship, like the right to vote. The matter of women’s suffrage would be at the forefront despite the war, and President Wilson was not happy about it. Wilson thought it was a distraction from larger matters, and would even imprison women protesting for this right amidst the war.
The Women’s Suffrage Movement has been ongoing since America’s earliest colonial roots, but formally began in 1848. By the time World War I came around, women were not only sick of waiting, but Suffragists were also at war with themselves, as the major parties and feminists within the movement divided over opinions on goals, methods, and the extremes they were willing to take to reach their goals.
By 1890, the movement was mainly under the leadership of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, with Elizabeth Cady Stanton serving as their first president.
Several Western states soon started to extend the vote to women, and by 1916, Jeanette Rankin became the first American woman to hold federal office as a representative of Montana. However, the states in the East and South were holding firm against suffrage. NAWSA’s president Carrie Chapman Catt called for a national push. Women in states that already had the vote should push for a federal amendment, women in states without it should continue to work on the state level.
For some, these methods were simply too slow. NAWSA saw a splinter organization form, called the National Woman’s Party. This group, led by Alice Paul, Lucy Burns, Gail Laughlin, and more, decided that asking for the vote had long proven ineffective, and it was time to demand it. In 1920, Paul proclaimed that, “There will never be a new world order until women are a part of it.”
The NWP protested at the White House, held parades, published more militant literature, and even used hunger strikes to make their point known. Paul and a number of her followers would be arrested and spend time in jail for their tactics, but their message was clear: It was time for women to be recognized politically!
Paul would also address the elephant in the room – the international crisis of war. She said, “The world crisis came about without women having anything to do with it. If the women of the world had not been excluded from world affairs, things today might have been different.”
President Wilson, who had never been a big supporter of women’s rights, was even compelled to call upon Congress for suffrage. When he asked them to pass the 19th Amendment, he said, “I regard the concurrence of the Senate in the constitutional amendment proposing the extension of the suffrage to women as vitally essential to the successful prosecution of the great war of humanity in which we are engaged. The tasks of the women lie at the very heart of the war, and I know how much stronger that heart will beat if you do this just thing and show our women that you trust them as much as you in fact and of necessity depend upon them.”
Conclusion
In the end, the work of women in the war effort, the sacrifices made by American women during this time, the protests and demands of women’s organizations helped them to achieve a goal more than 150 years in the making.
By the end of this era, so much remained in question. President Wilson proclaimed America’s participation in the war was to make the world safe for democracy, but was America itself safe for democracy when half of its population was barred from voting based on their gender alone? To what extent did environment and timing make catalysts for social change?

















































