5. 800 - 400 BCE- European Founding Myths and Women's Place
Ancient Rome and Greece established gender norms that would last millennia in the Western world. These norms diminished women's rights and relegated them to the domestic sphere. And yet, there was nuance and differences across the early Western world.
How to cite this source?
Remedial Herstory Project Editors. "800-400 BCE - EUROPEAN FOUNDING MYTHS AND WOMEN’S PLACE." The Remedial Herstory Project. November 1, 2025. www.remedialherstory.com.
Trigger Warning: This chapter references rape and sexual assault.
The ancient world saw the rise of professional historians and thus more is known about the experiences of people who lived then, even women. However, almost everything we know about them was recorded by men. While these ancient city-states and budding empires are known for pretty amazing things like democracy, enduring philosophies, and uniting massive empires, very little of this “progress” was designed by or for women and often these ideologies laid the groundwork for millennia of oppression for women every settled place in the world. Not all women’s experiences in the ancient past were positive, so this chapter may be triggering for some due to discussion of sexual assault and rape.
Join the Club
Join our email list and help us make herstory!
Ancient Greece
Ancient Greece is one of the few places in the ancient world where we are able to learn about the experiences of women, from women themselves. Much of what women wrote about was love in the form of poetry, and they were pretty good at it. In the 5th century BCE, Korinna of Boeotia beat Theban poet Pindar in competition five times.
Sappho of the Greek island Lesbos, is perhaps the most famous poet of Ancient Greece. Only one of her poems survives in complete form, while other fragments and quotes from her are referenced in surviving literature. Sappho is known for her passionate poetry about her romantic love for another woman. She writes, “I would remind you [...] of all the loveliness that we have shared together [...] you wove around yourself by my side.”
But sex was another matter. Attitudes on sexual relations varied according to class and gender. Women’s customary role was to produce legitimate children, an act that took the lives of countless women. In fact, to be married in most of world history was to triple your chances of premature death. As women’s connection to sex was purely about procreation, extramarital relations with other men were suspect. Men, however, could have concubines, hire prostitutes, or even patronize well-educated women called hetaira, not just for sex, but their skills in dance, music, and conversation.
This double standard applied to male and female sexuality was not just oppressive, it cost many women their lives. Women judged to be unchaste were murdered by their own families in every region of the world. These so-called “honor killings,” are still legal in some parts of the world. A prehistoric grave in Britain found the bodies of two women that had been buried naked and alive. They discovered that the younger woman had been brutally raped, her assailant using a spear through the knee to pin her down. She was later killed by her own family - the crime being the loss of her virginity.

Carving of Enheduanna
Unchaste (adj.), relating to or engaging in sexual activity, especially of an illicit or extramarital nature.
Women's Health In Ancient Greece
Because so much of a woman’s life revolved around her uterus, it’s no wonder medical writing of this time focused a lot on that. Hippocrates is known today for the Hippocratic Oath that doctors take, swearing to do no harm. He was an ancient Greek physician whose ideas were recorded by other male physicians years later. The compilation of medical works attributed to Hippocrates, known as the Hippocratic Corpus, included treatises like Diseases of Women, Nature of Women, and Diseases of Young Girls. He looked for natural causes for disease rather than godly retribution and his is the work from which almost all Western medical thinking is derived even today. Keep in mind this was written before autopsies were done so they knew very little about internal organs.
Hippocrates believed women's bodies were different from men’s and therefore their illnesses needed to be dealt with differently. He remarked that a lot of women died because physicians treated them like men, but he was definitely not championing women’s rights. Hippocratic physicians wrote extensively about female puberty, menstruation, conception, pregnancy, and menopause. Yet, they seemed to conclude that every illness that afflicted a woman somehow was related to her uterus and the cure for women’s ailments was for them to have more sex with men. He wrote, "I assert that a woman who has not borne children becomes ill from her menses more seriously and sooner than one who has borne children." Doctors believed that epileptic fits, visions, loss of breath, pain, and paralysis were all a result of the woman not having enough sex and not producing children.
How did the womb impact so many different body parts? Doctors in Ancient Greece hypothesized that it wandered around a woman's body bumping into different organs as it went. Herbal remedies were used to send the uterus back to its rightful place. Greek physician Aretaeus of Cappadocia described the wandering womb as "An animal within an animal."
With these views of the female body, it's no wonder that women physicians and midwives took matters into their own hands. Agnodice, for example, disguised herself as a man to study medicine and became a skilled gynecologist. Rival doctors hoped to supersede her by claiming she was seducing her patients. She was eventually discovered and charged with practicing medicine as a female. Still, the practice of cross-dressing for personal or professional pursuits continued until women were allowed to pursue nontraditional occupations.
%2C_National_Archaeological_Museum_of_At.jpg)
Funerary relief a woman dying from childbirth, with her midwife and husband on either side of her

Engraving of Agnodice
Midwife (n.), a person (typically a woman) trained to assist women in childbirth.
Supersede (v.), take the place of (a person or thing previously in authority or use)
Women in Greek Literature
Through men’s writing, we gain insights into Greek views of women. Ancient male authors demonstrated their fears of and desires for women through fantastic and mythical tales about monstrous females. Essayist Jess Zimmerman said female monsters represent “the bedtime stories patriarchy tells itself,” which were prevalent in Ancient Greece. One of the most famous pieces of Greek literature, Homer’s Odyssey, is full of these women. At one point, Odysseus must choose between fighting a six-headed, twelve-legged beast-woman or a female sea monster.
In almost all these tales, the woman had somehow rejected her proper state of nurturing caregiver and met her end at the hands of a heroic male. The Odyssey states women’s role clearly, “Go inside the house, and attend to your work, the loom and distaff, and bid your handmaidens attend to their work also. Talking is men’s business.” But the city-states of Greece were different from one another, and literature does not always reflect the realities of life in the past.
Greek mythology did not shy away from the image of a strong, warrior woman.
In fact, many Greek histories, epics, and folklore describe an entire race of warrior women known as the Amazons, who were supposed to be the daughters of the god of war, Ares, who had been denied their role as nurturing mothers. Their origins were unknown, described as existing at the far-reaches of known society near the Black Sea, in a community of women. Men were allowed into their society only for breeding purposes, though some myths claim Ares was the father of them all. They are described as wearing hoplite armor, using a bow or spear, often on horseback, and being tall and muscular.
These warrior women are also said to have stood toe-to-toe with the greatest of Greek warriors according to the mythology of the time. Hercules was challenged to the impossible task of stealing Queen Hippolyte’s girdle. He was ultimately successful, but according to some legends, it required a full army to overtake the Amazons. Hercules is also depicted in pottery fighting the Amazon Andromeda. Future ruler of Athens, Theseus, fell in love with Amazon Antiope and abducted her, only to lose her in battle as the Amazons fought to bring her home. Even the ultimate Greek warrior, Achilles, took on the Amazons. Toward the end of the Trojan War, the Trojans were calling in every favor they had in hopes of holding off the Greek alliance. The Amazons arrived from those far reaches of society and their best warrior, Penthesilea, was sent to duel with Achilles, who had already killed countless Trojan warriors and heroes. There are contradicting versions of the story from there. In one version, Achilles slays her as he did the best men of Troy. In another, he slays her, but falls in love with her as his one true equal just before she dies. In yet another, she kills him, only for the gods to resurrect him and have him defeat her.
Herodotus claims that the Amazons eventually combined with another traditional warrior people, the Scythians, and settled in southern Russia, becoming the Sarmatians. However, proof that the Amazons existed is speculative at best. Yet, that doesn’t diminish what they can tell us about Greek society’s view of women. Amazons were used by the great to symbolize the horrors of what happens when women abandon their traditional mothering roles. At the same time, if these women are entirely fictional, they were still purposefully created by the Greeks. The Greeks, who were enamored with perfection in every way, may have imagined a society of powerful, self-sufficient women who could tussle with the strongest men Greece had to offer. The woman who could challenge Hercules. The woman who could best Achilles.
Classicist historian Mary Beard explained that in the ancient tradition, female subordination was deeply ingrained in the culture in accounts of the time both in the East and West. She wrote a gendered analysis of Homer’s The Odyssey using Penelope as an example. In the story, she said, “as Homer has it, an integral part of growing up, as a man, is learning to control the public utterance and to silence the female of the species.” Beard went on to explain that entire works were dedicated to the absurdity and inferiority of female power. Examining the stories about the mythical Amazon women, Beard concluded that, “The underlying point was that it was the duty of man to save civilization from the rule of women.” She elegantly showed that oratory and power in the West have always seemed to be a male sphere of influence.
In the real world, however, women’s lives were far more restricted. Athens, for example, is viewed as a pillar of democracy and freedom, but Athenian women were basically slaves to the men around them and had no voice in business or politics, so democracy was truly for (free) men. Upper class women were pushed into the domestic sphere, not allowed to speak in public, or at times, to even be seen in public. They lived inside their homes, preparing meals and tending to the house. Education for women was rare and only available to wealthy women. They didn’t have property rights or rights as widows. The only events that women were allowed to attend were religious ceremonies. Women were punished severely for adultery and did not have any sexual freedom outside of marriage. Although some Athenian women were merchants, potters, or other professionals, they were routinely secluded from men (possibly even in the home), had no legal recourse in the courts, limited economic power, and no political voice. They were allowed to be citizens of Athens but what is citizenship without freedom?
Sparta was a world apart. Spartan women participated freely in almost every aspect of their city-state’s social life. Women were trained as athletes because Spartans believed women needed to be physically healthy to survive birth. They were seen outside the home, and girls were educated within the home just like the boys, although the boys would typically go on to private school. Through liaisons with men other than their husbands, Spartan women could also acquire control of more than one home and surrounding lands, and many became wealthy landowners. There was a significant number of widows in Sparta who had lost husbands and sons in the wars but never had to worry about survival because they owned the land and knew how to make it profitable. The purpose of sex within marriage was to create strong, healthy children, but women were allowed to take male lovers to accomplish this same end. Same-sex relationships among men and women were not uncommon and were pursued for pleasure and personal fulfillment. These relationships were regarded as natural as long as both parties were of a certain age and had consented. However, we must not forget that Spartan society could only exist because it practiced slavery and was exceedingly brutal in order to maintain social order.

Hercules battling Hippolyta
Hoplite (n.), a heavily armed foot soldier of ancient Greece.
Girdle (n.), a belt or cord worn around the waist.

Amazons fighting the Greeks in the Trojan War, Achilles and Penthisilea in the center

Spartan woman giving her son a shield
Greek Views of Women’s Education
For the Greeks, women’s lesser position and thus their lack of support for women’s education, was justified by the gods. Hesiod, a Greek thinker, wrote, “Zeus, who thundered on high, made women to be evil to mortal men, with the nature to do evil.” Another male thinker, Semonides, wrote, “the worst plague Zeus ever made, women.” Famous mathematician Pythagoras wrote, “there’s a good principle which created order, light, and man, and an evil principle which created chaos, darkness, and woman.“ Pythagoras, however, was educated by Artistoclea, a female scholar, and possibly married to Theano, another female scholar and mathematician, who ran his school after he died. She wrote on mathematics and philosophy, and when asked when a woman’s purity returned after sex and she supposedly answered, “With your husband, instantly, with somebody else, never.” Pythagoras’ daughter Dano also championed women’s education.
Socrates, who was educated by Diotima, another female scholar, said, “all the pursuits of men are the pursuits of women also, but in all of them a woman is inferior to a man.” Plato’s teacher was Aspasia, another female scholar, but yet he placed women between man and beast. Aristotle wrote that women were, “mutilated males.” Menander stated, “he who teaches a woman letters feeds more poison to the frightful asp.” Perhaps his disdain for women was grounded in fear of their power.
These beliefs were nearly universal among Greek men and society. Women were regarded as inherently vicious, irrational, and untrustworthy, and investment in their education was useless, counterproductive, and potentially dangerous. The flagrant disrespect and blindness to the hypocrisy that one could be educated by a woman and doubt her intellect is unbelievable and shows how pervasive misogyny was in Greek society. Women in this climate faced reprehensible misogyny, yet some persisted in their efforts to be educated and find fulfillment beyond the domestic sphere.
In all, the lives of Greek women were a bit better than those of women in other places. Women’s subjugation was so terrible that in many places they dominated the ranks of the enslaved. Greek historian Diodorus wrote on his travels to Egypt, that enslaved women there “were continually without being allowed any rest by night or day. They have not a rag to cover their nakedness, and neither the weakness of age nor women’s infirmities are any plea to excuse them, but they are driven by blows until they drop dead.”

Portrait of Diotima
Misogyny (n.), dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
Subjugation (n.), the action of bringing someone or something under domination or control.
Romulus and Remus
There are several stories of Rome’s founding, but perhaps the most popular and bizarre historical legends of a city’s founding is the story of Romulus and Remus. The city’s two male founders were brothers born to a virgin priestess by the name of Rhea Silvia. According to the Roman writer Livy, she was raped by the god Mars. She gave birth to twin brothers who were thrown into the nearby river to drown by the king who viewed them as a threat to his power. Yet, they survived (believed to be saved by the gods) and were nursed back to health by a conveniently lactating she-wolf. Interestingly, the Roman word for wolf was also a colloquial term for prostitute, and so it’s possible that, despite what the myth says, the boys were nursed to health by a lower class woman. A shepherd supposedly found the boys and it is even possible that his wife was the prostitute.
The boys were always competitive and when they grew up, they first waged war against the king who condemned them, but then chose to go out on their own to start a new society. However, they fought over what parts of the hills that surround the eventual city of Rome would be the best place to start their new city. The details here are fuzzy, but what everybody agrees upon is that Romulus killed his brother and became the sole ruler of Rome.
Colloquial (adj.), (of language) used in ordinary or familiar conversation; slang.

Romulus and Remus after being discovered by Faustulus
Rome’s Regal Period
Many single men flocked to this newly-founded city, which included runaway slaves, convicted criminals, exiles, and refugees. In order for civilizations to survive, they needed women, so Romulus resorted to abduction and rape (both have the same meaning in Latin). He invited the men of neighboring villages to have a festival and in the middle of it, the men of Rome snuck away and abducted the young women from the visiting families and carried them off as wives.
Where was the dividing line between abduction and rape? Livy defends the behavior of the early Roman males as an effort toward marriage, thus he did not consider it rape. He argued that this behavior was necessary for the future of the realm while others used this story to demonstrate the belligerence of Rome. Romulus’s father was Mars, the god of war, after all.
The families of the Sabine women did not find their abduction and rape to be innocent or flirtatious efforts toward marriage. The men went to war but hostilities between the men were halted because the women ran out onto the battlefield and begged the men in their life to stop fighting. Even in such dire circumstances, the women chose the path of peace.
Romulus‘s reign sparked the beginning of the Regal Period in Roman history. Interestingly, the end of the Regal Period was also marked by the story of rape. A young group of drunken Romans were trying to find a way to pass the time and began a debate about whose wife was best. To settle the debate, Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus suggested they ride home and see whether they had “good” wives. All the wives were found partying in the absence of their husbands, except for Lucius’ wife Lucretia, who was abstaining from such behavior as a “good wife” should.
It was her purity, loyalty, and chastity that made her such a good wife, but that’s not the end of the story. After seeing such an amazing woman, Sextus Tarquinius became obsessed with Lucretia and came back to her house days later and raped her. She was mortified and after telling her husband what happened, she killed herself - because as the Romans saw it, her chastity was more valuable than her life.
Male Roman writers discussed Lucretia for centuries. Some honored her commitment to chastity as the embodiment of the ideal woman. Others wondered if she was really innocent. Maybe she had been a willing participant (an argument still made about rape victims today) and killed herself because she felt guilty. Others still wondered if a pure wife was not truly ideal.
As Rome’s early period started and ended with rape, Romans living after the initial period of kings and during the time of the Republic used the rapes of Rhea Silvia, the Sabine women, and Lucretia as evidence that the kings did not serve society.

Sculpture depicting the abduction of the Sabine women

Painting titled “The Rape of the Sabine Women”
.jpg)
Painting titled “The Intervention of the Sabine Women”

Painting titled “The Intervention of the Sabine Women”
Gladiators
Rome is often identified in the public mind with public displays of masculinity by the gladiators, who fought to the death for the entertainment of the ruler and the masses. We have learned that many gladiators were enslaved men. Thus, when the game’s host and the crowd ruled that a fighter was to be killed, it was with the understanding that the owner of the fight’s winner would pay the owner of the slave to be killed. For this reason, many gladiatorial contests ended in a draw.
Two Roman gladiators whose names were Amazon and Archilla are depicted in sculpture whose accompanying plaque declares that they fought to a “noble draw.” On further study we find that these two fighters were women. Female gladiators, called gladiatrices, represented what we might consider a novelty in Ancient Rome who fought for pure entertainment more than blood lust. The women, like their male counterparts, were often slaves, but a few were of a higher class who were attracted to the excitement and danger of fighting before crowds of thousands. They were applauded but not necessarily held in high esteem as middle-class women were expected to play proper and chaste roles as wives and mothers. We know little about these women, except that they were few in number. Amazon and Archilla were exceptions, as their faces and their exploits were memorialized for the future.

Amazon and Archilla
Conclusion
The experience of women in Greece and Rome was not unique. It was replicated around the world. Women, wherever they were, faced all the same challenges men did - war, famine, plague, and drought - but in addition they faced special challenges by being female. Why did these norms develop, and why would women submit to these norms? Why were they so universally accepted? Would women be able to circumvent these norms? Would women’s education and liberation become available, if not in the modern sense?






































