top of page

In this inquiry, students will examine various primary and secondary sources. After each document, students will determine whether the source thinks women vote in a distinct way when voting or if there is a clear distinction between different demographics. Graphs, primary images, and excerpts discussing the relationship between voting results and race are used in this lesson.  Included with this item is: the lesson plan, a lesson specific powerpoint, as well as a teacher resource which help answer the lesson plan. If you modify any of the materials please feel free to send them back to us, so we can see where you made changes.

Is there such a thing as a “women’s vote”

0,00 $Preis

    MONATLICHE GÄSTE
    Jeff Eckert, Barbara Tischler, Brooke Sullivan, Christian Bourdo, Kent Heckel, Jenna Koloski, Nancy Heckel, Megan Torrey-Payne, Leah Tanger, Mark Bryer, Nicole Woulfe, Alicia Gutierrez-Romine, Katya Miller, Michelle Stonis, Jessica Freire, Laura Holiday, Jacqui Nelson, Annabelle Blevins Pifer, Dawn Cyr, Megan Gary, Melissa Adams, Victoria Plutshack, Rachel Lee, Perez, Kate Kemp, Bridget Erlandson, Leah Spellerberg, Rebecca Sanborn Marshall, Ashley Satterfield, Milly Neff, Alexandra Plutshack, Martha Wheelock, Gwen Duralek, Maureen Barthen, Pamela Scully, Elizabeth Blanchard und Christina Luzzi.

    HAUPTSPENDER
    Pioniere: Deb Coffin, Annalee Davis Thorndike Foundation, Rhode Island Community Foundation
    Symbol: Jean German, Dr. Barbara und Dr. Steve Tischler, Dr. Leah Redmond Chang

    Bleiben Sie mit unserem Newsletter auf dem Laufenden.

    © 2025 von

    Das Projekt zur Aufarbeitung der Frauengeschichte.

    Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

    bottom of page