7. 100 BCE - 100 CE Women and the Roman Empire
|
Roman history is packed full of unbelievably powerful and fascinating women. Famous women, like Cleopatra, helped to define Roman history through her relationships and power grabs with Roman leaders. The wives of those leaders, Octavia and Scibonia for example, as well as their daughters, like Julia, also played intricate roles in the history of Rome. Women close to the emperor could manipulate it. Cleopatra was not the only ancient woman to take on male Roman rulers. Outside of Rome women battling against its expansion from every direction, namely Buddica, Zenobia, and Kandake. These women were powerful anti-imperial forces. Importantly, both inside and outside the power of Rome, women played politics, fought, and led.
|
|
River valleys settlements became city states. City states became empires. The Mesopotamian Empires that had dominated ancient times dissolved into the Persian and eventually Macedonian Empire, spreading Greek culture around the Mediterranean world. The Romans eventually surpassed the Greeks and thus Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa, came under Roman rule between 500 BCE to around 500 CE. In China the first empire, Qin, known for its harsh legal rule would be replaced by the Han from 200 BCE to 200 CE. Stability! Yay! But did women live and thrive in these Empires? Were any opposed to these Empires? Aw, heck yes– and several took action to defend their homeland.
Rome: Roman culture built on the Greek culture that preceded and paralleled it. Its polytheistic religious beliefs accounted for the renaming of most of the Greek gods into Roman equivalents. It adopted most of the Greek ideas about medicine, philosophy, culture, and a woman’s place. Check out Founding Myths and Women’s Place to learn more about these.
But the Romans developed their own ideas. As Rome expanded, it increasingly became a warrior society where masculinity was strictly defined and men were measured on their successes as soldiers and property owners: which included women. In their private lives, this meant absolute control over their wives, children, and slaves. Absolute control means exactly what it sounds like, including the right to kill them without interference from anyone– not even the government. Absolute freedom became a part of the male identity. As the Empire expanded and government control seeped into people's personal lives, so did the life and death power of the (male) head of household.
Rome: Roman culture built on the Greek culture that preceded and paralleled it. Its polytheistic religious beliefs accounted for the renaming of most of the Greek gods into Roman equivalents. It adopted most of the Greek ideas about medicine, philosophy, culture, and a woman’s place. Check out Founding Myths and Women’s Place to learn more about these.
But the Romans developed their own ideas. As Rome expanded, it increasingly became a warrior society where masculinity was strictly defined and men were measured on their successes as soldiers and property owners: which included women. In their private lives, this meant absolute control over their wives, children, and slaves. Absolute control means exactly what it sounds like, including the right to kill them without interference from anyone– not even the government. Absolute freedom became a part of the male identity. As the Empire expanded and government control seeped into people's personal lives, so did the life and death power of the (male) head of household.
Roman Gods and Goddesses, Public Domain
Roman Motherhood, Public Domain
Women participated in this warrior culture by raising brave sons and passing on the values of the warrior state to her children. Roman mothers were known to tell their sons off to war, "Return with your shield or on it.” Yikes!
The endless conquests of the Roman empire also meant that hundreds of thousands of women and men were brought into the empire as slaves. Female slaves did domestic work, worked in brothels, were dancers, actresses, and were sometimes used for sex by their male owners. Slavery was deeply embedded in the culture of Rome, many viewing it as punishment from the gods or God.
Despite the persistent beliefs that women should not be educated, upper class Roman women capitalized on the need to build strong and educated warriors to justify their own educations as mothers and future wives of military leaders. In order to protect family fortunes, elite women were sometimes married off without transferring legal control to their husbands.This allowed them to manage their own fortunes. Imagine that. However, more often their legal control just remained with their father or previous male guardian. During the reign of Augustus, he passed a law that stated free-born women who bore three or more children were free from guardianship. Otherwise women were under the control of a man.
Little changed for the average woman in regard to her contribution to the public sphere and intellectual prospects. Educated women were educated enough to serve the home and rear their children. Male contemporaries remained staunchly opposed to women’s education. Given that wealth in Rome led to greater male education, there is significant evidence to suggest that the ratio of literate women actually declined. Titus Livy, one of the first Roman historians, stated, “a woman’s mind is influenced by little things.” Publius Syrus said, “A woman who meditates alone meditates evil.” Another wrote his misogyny in a poem, “But out of all plagues, the greatest is untold; the book learned wife, in Greek and Latin bold.” If the scholars of the era held such hostile views of women thinking, let alone writing, there was little possibility for mainstream training, recognition, and archiving of female achievements.
Yet we do know about some women, notably the most elite of elite women. Their power or proximity to power meant that their lives and stories would be recorded.
The endless conquests of the Roman empire also meant that hundreds of thousands of women and men were brought into the empire as slaves. Female slaves did domestic work, worked in brothels, were dancers, actresses, and were sometimes used for sex by their male owners. Slavery was deeply embedded in the culture of Rome, many viewing it as punishment from the gods or God.
Despite the persistent beliefs that women should not be educated, upper class Roman women capitalized on the need to build strong and educated warriors to justify their own educations as mothers and future wives of military leaders. In order to protect family fortunes, elite women were sometimes married off without transferring legal control to their husbands.This allowed them to manage their own fortunes. Imagine that. However, more often their legal control just remained with their father or previous male guardian. During the reign of Augustus, he passed a law that stated free-born women who bore three or more children were free from guardianship. Otherwise women were under the control of a man.
Little changed for the average woman in regard to her contribution to the public sphere and intellectual prospects. Educated women were educated enough to serve the home and rear their children. Male contemporaries remained staunchly opposed to women’s education. Given that wealth in Rome led to greater male education, there is significant evidence to suggest that the ratio of literate women actually declined. Titus Livy, one of the first Roman historians, stated, “a woman’s mind is influenced by little things.” Publius Syrus said, “A woman who meditates alone meditates evil.” Another wrote his misogyny in a poem, “But out of all plagues, the greatest is untold; the book learned wife, in Greek and Latin bold.” If the scholars of the era held such hostile views of women thinking, let alone writing, there was little possibility for mainstream training, recognition, and archiving of female achievements.
Yet we do know about some women, notably the most elite of elite women. Their power or proximity to power meant that their lives and stories would be recorded.
Cleopatra, Public Domain
Cleopatra: Across the Mediterranean from Rome, one of the most famous female rulers came to power: Cleopatra. Even if she did famously escape her own palace once in a burlap sack. Cleopatra was not Roman, she was the last leader of Ptolematic Egypt, but her reign had a huge influence on Rome and is seen as a crucial part of the transition of Rome into the Roman Empire. Cleopatra was trying to keep Egypt in play as a major world power in the wake of the crushing Roman Republic and both internal and external threats. In 51 B.C., the Egyptian throne passed to 18-year-old Cleopatra and her 10-year-old brother, Ptolemy XIII. As is all too common in politics, her brother’s advisors soon painted her as a political threat, and she was forced to flee to Syria. Refusing to see her power stripped away she raised an army of mercenaries and returned the following year to face her brother’s forces in a civil war. She was known to not only be financing the war, but also made sure to have a presence on the battlefield and in the officers’ planning.
She also used all the weapons at her disposal, including her political guile. When Julius Caesar came to Alexandria, Cleopatra had herself smuggled into his headquarters to ask for his support in this war against her brother. Finding mutually beneficial ground (power for her, money for him) they eventually united against her brother, and successfully overthrew him. She also gave birth to Caesar’s son.
Cleopatra would maintain a long, strained relationship with Caesar and Rome, but after Caesar’s assassination, she saw herself potentially in the crosshairs of the new Roman Empire. In her time as pharaoh, she worked to gain the respect of the people for herself and her son, even identifying herself as a vessel of the goddess Isis, which was typical of Egyptian royalty trying to secure their power.
However, internal strife always followed Cleopatra. Her younger sister Arsinoe who had been exiled was looking to dethrone Cleopatra, and seeking additional security, Cleopatra found herself in a political and romantic alliance with Mark Antony– her ultimate undoing. In her first formal meeting with the general, Plutarch wrote, “she brought with her her surest hopes in her own magic arts and charms.”
Antony though was in his own power struggle with Julius Caesar's designated successor, his nephew Octavian (the eventual Augustus), over control of the empire, which had been divided into three different sections. In an attempt to secure peace, Octavian's younger sister Octavia had been married off to Antony. The marriage was initially successful, but tensions mounted and Antony and Octavian were soon at war. In 36BCE Antony left to command troops in Parthia resuming his alliance and romantic liaison with Cleopatra. Octavia was a good and decent wife who, despite his betrayal and infidelity, brought him troops and money. When she arrived, he refused her, and three years later obtained a divorce.
Cleopatra brought her ships and soldiers to aid Antony in the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE, but they lost and she and Antony fled back to Alexandria, only to be cornered. Both, famously, committed suicide and their bodies were paraded in a victory parade in Rome. Back in Italy, Octavia raised Antony’s children by Cleopatra along with their own children. Cleopatra brought her ships and soldiers to back Antony, but they lost.
Despite being mother to Julius Caesar's son, Cleopatra was labeled as a seductress by Roman historians due to her relationships, and while these relationships were undoubtedly romantic in nature, she used the opportunity to protect her power. Cleopatra stood toe-to-toe with some of the most famous figures of the classical world.
She also used all the weapons at her disposal, including her political guile. When Julius Caesar came to Alexandria, Cleopatra had herself smuggled into his headquarters to ask for his support in this war against her brother. Finding mutually beneficial ground (power for her, money for him) they eventually united against her brother, and successfully overthrew him. She also gave birth to Caesar’s son.
Cleopatra would maintain a long, strained relationship with Caesar and Rome, but after Caesar’s assassination, she saw herself potentially in the crosshairs of the new Roman Empire. In her time as pharaoh, she worked to gain the respect of the people for herself and her son, even identifying herself as a vessel of the goddess Isis, which was typical of Egyptian royalty trying to secure their power.
However, internal strife always followed Cleopatra. Her younger sister Arsinoe who had been exiled was looking to dethrone Cleopatra, and seeking additional security, Cleopatra found herself in a political and romantic alliance with Mark Antony– her ultimate undoing. In her first formal meeting with the general, Plutarch wrote, “she brought with her her surest hopes in her own magic arts and charms.”
Antony though was in his own power struggle with Julius Caesar's designated successor, his nephew Octavian (the eventual Augustus), over control of the empire, which had been divided into three different sections. In an attempt to secure peace, Octavian's younger sister Octavia had been married off to Antony. The marriage was initially successful, but tensions mounted and Antony and Octavian were soon at war. In 36BCE Antony left to command troops in Parthia resuming his alliance and romantic liaison with Cleopatra. Octavia was a good and decent wife who, despite his betrayal and infidelity, brought him troops and money. When she arrived, he refused her, and three years later obtained a divorce.
Cleopatra brought her ships and soldiers to aid Antony in the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE, but they lost and she and Antony fled back to Alexandria, only to be cornered. Both, famously, committed suicide and their bodies were paraded in a victory parade in Rome. Back in Italy, Octavia raised Antony’s children by Cleopatra along with their own children. Cleopatra brought her ships and soldiers to back Antony, but they lost.
Despite being mother to Julius Caesar's son, Cleopatra was labeled as a seductress by Roman historians due to her relationships, and while these relationships were undoubtedly romantic in nature, she used the opportunity to protect her power. Cleopatra stood toe-to-toe with some of the most famous figures of the classical world.
Cleopatra, Public Domain
Kandake, Wikimedia Commons
Kandake Amanirenas: Further south, another female African monarch prepared to face Rome and cease their expansion southward, and unlike Cleopatra, she would succeed–sort of. Romans began incursions south toward the Empire of Kush, so the Kushites planned a preemptive attack on Roman-held cities in southern Egypt and were initially successful, but their king died in battle.
Back home the Queen, Kandake meaning “great woman,” Amanirenas, and her son, again led the Kushites north to engage the Romans. Romans responded by leading 10,000 soldiers southward. The result was basically a stalemate. By succeeding in the negotiations, Kandake Amanirenas spared her people domination– like a bad-ass boss-woman of the ancient world.
Empresses of Rome: Back in Rome, Cleopatra’s defeat and continued Roman expansion would lead to wealth and a long line of powerful empresses. Octavian was surrounded by powerful women who defined and navigated political leadership like a boss– although a lot of them ended up tragically dead.
Back home the Queen, Kandake meaning “great woman,” Amanirenas, and her son, again led the Kushites north to engage the Romans. Romans responded by leading 10,000 soldiers southward. The result was basically a stalemate. By succeeding in the negotiations, Kandake Amanirenas spared her people domination– like a bad-ass boss-woman of the ancient world.
Empresses of Rome: Back in Rome, Cleopatra’s defeat and continued Roman expansion would lead to wealth and a long line of powerful empresses. Octavian was surrounded by powerful women who defined and navigated political leadership like a boss– although a lot of them ended up tragically dead.
Livia Drusilla, Wikimedia Commons
The Julias: Octavian’s wife, Scibonia, gave him his only child, a daughter: Julia. When she was only a few days old, apparently Augustus fell in love with Livia Drusilla on sight and they both promptly divorced their spouses. As empress consort, Livia was active in politics and governed her own affairs. She pushed him towards making his heir, Tiberius, Livia’s from her first marriage. Augustus forced him to divorce his wife and instead marry his daughter Julia, her second political marriage, and a marriage neither wanted. Julia already had two daughters, another Julia and Agrippina the Elder. When Julia and Tiberius’ only child died in infancy, any semblance of happiness they had was gone. Julia was left alone in Rome, where by many accounts she lived a pretty promiscuous life. Roman author Macrobius claimed was a witty and intelligent woman and was loved by the people, but her sexual activity led Augustus to exile her as a “disease in my flesh.” She died from malnutrition on a random island, because as we know, promiscuity by women is NEVER tolerated.
Augustus gave his wife Livia the title of Augusta, which meant that she would maintain her title after he died. He left her one third of his estates– which is a lot. Her son Tiberius found her power hard to maneuver around, an influence she maintained through political allies. But Tiberius’s rule was problematic for other reasons. Mostly Julia the Elder’s daughters were wreaking havoc on his legitimacy. Agrippina the Elder accused him of murdering her husband, whom she had nine children with! So many children! When Tiberius’ son died, hers came into the line of succession, so she and her older sons were exiled and died. Yikes! It’s a wonder all of these exiles didn’t band together and start their own civilization!
Her remaining son became Tiberius’ successor, Emperor Caligula, and three daughters survived. Caligula was by all accounts a terrible ruler, so his sister, Julia (yes the third one) and Agrippina the Younger plotted to kill him. Agrippina was exiled for a bit, but when Caligula was finally murdered, her uncle and third husband, Claudius, brought her back to Rome. Agrippina was labeled by historians as the “first true empress of Rome.”
Claudius was Livia’s grandson. His third wife was executed for having an affair with a Senator. So Agrippina the Younger needed to navigate her path cautiously and by all accounts she did. He elevated her title to the one his grandmother had, Augusta, and elevated Livia to deity status! According to some sources Claudius was sickly, weak and not suited for imperial life, although by the standards of his successors he did a pretty okay job. Despite being an Empress consort, Agrippina wanted to exercise real power. She was visible in politics and sat next to Claudius at occasions of state. For five years there was prosperity, but Roman historians tell us Agrippina wanted even more influence, so she murdered Claudius and installed her infamous son: Nero. Good prospects: zero.
Gold coins from right after Nero became emperor show him nose to nose with his mom, with the title, “Wife of the Deified Claudius, Mother of Nero Caesar.” But Roman historians who recorded his legacy sought to paint him as the epitome of a corrupt, debaucherous, and evil ruler. In doing so they told the stories of his violence against women. It’s hard to know what is true and what is not, because the authors of these texts were blatantly biased against him. According to later Roman historians, he and his mother were sometimes lovers— ew! Then in order to solidify his rule, he had her killed because she was too powerful and Senators were teasing him for being “ruled by a woman” and his manhood was threatened. A little bit of ancient toxic masculinity, anyone? The Roman historian Tacitus alleged that Agrippina was so desperate for power after murdering her husband that she seduced her own son! Regardless of the likely exaggerations, Nero did order his mother killed. Later, Nero apparently had his first wife, and step-sister, Claudia Octavia (the daughter of Claudius) banished, bound, and stabbed before suffocating her in a hot bath. He then murdered his second wife, Poppaea Sabina, by kicking her pregnant belly. But a lot of this probably tells us more about the historians than Nero and his wives. It is interesting though that ill-treatment of women was used to demonstrate the evil nature of a ruler, which perhaps suggests that treating your women well was to be admired (a controversial opinion in those days!)
Although Nero is remembered for killing Christians, intentionally burning Rome, and other ridiculous things, a lot of evidence shows that Nero was not unpopular with the people. He clashed with the Senate and wealthy elites because they wanted to maintain their wealth, but the Roman Empire could no longer be governed like a city state-- taxes had to be raised, and soldiers sent to defend land. The government had difficulty defending its vast territory from the many “barbarian” tribes moving into Roman lands.
Augustus gave his wife Livia the title of Augusta, which meant that she would maintain her title after he died. He left her one third of his estates– which is a lot. Her son Tiberius found her power hard to maneuver around, an influence she maintained through political allies. But Tiberius’s rule was problematic for other reasons. Mostly Julia the Elder’s daughters were wreaking havoc on his legitimacy. Agrippina the Elder accused him of murdering her husband, whom she had nine children with! So many children! When Tiberius’ son died, hers came into the line of succession, so she and her older sons were exiled and died. Yikes! It’s a wonder all of these exiles didn’t band together and start their own civilization!
Her remaining son became Tiberius’ successor, Emperor Caligula, and three daughters survived. Caligula was by all accounts a terrible ruler, so his sister, Julia (yes the third one) and Agrippina the Younger plotted to kill him. Agrippina was exiled for a bit, but when Caligula was finally murdered, her uncle and third husband, Claudius, brought her back to Rome. Agrippina was labeled by historians as the “first true empress of Rome.”
Claudius was Livia’s grandson. His third wife was executed for having an affair with a Senator. So Agrippina the Younger needed to navigate her path cautiously and by all accounts she did. He elevated her title to the one his grandmother had, Augusta, and elevated Livia to deity status! According to some sources Claudius was sickly, weak and not suited for imperial life, although by the standards of his successors he did a pretty okay job. Despite being an Empress consort, Agrippina wanted to exercise real power. She was visible in politics and sat next to Claudius at occasions of state. For five years there was prosperity, but Roman historians tell us Agrippina wanted even more influence, so she murdered Claudius and installed her infamous son: Nero. Good prospects: zero.
Gold coins from right after Nero became emperor show him nose to nose with his mom, with the title, “Wife of the Deified Claudius, Mother of Nero Caesar.” But Roman historians who recorded his legacy sought to paint him as the epitome of a corrupt, debaucherous, and evil ruler. In doing so they told the stories of his violence against women. It’s hard to know what is true and what is not, because the authors of these texts were blatantly biased against him. According to later Roman historians, he and his mother were sometimes lovers— ew! Then in order to solidify his rule, he had her killed because she was too powerful and Senators were teasing him for being “ruled by a woman” and his manhood was threatened. A little bit of ancient toxic masculinity, anyone? The Roman historian Tacitus alleged that Agrippina was so desperate for power after murdering her husband that she seduced her own son! Regardless of the likely exaggerations, Nero did order his mother killed. Later, Nero apparently had his first wife, and step-sister, Claudia Octavia (the daughter of Claudius) banished, bound, and stabbed before suffocating her in a hot bath. He then murdered his second wife, Poppaea Sabina, by kicking her pregnant belly. But a lot of this probably tells us more about the historians than Nero and his wives. It is interesting though that ill-treatment of women was used to demonstrate the evil nature of a ruler, which perhaps suggests that treating your women well was to be admired (a controversial opinion in those days!)
Although Nero is remembered for killing Christians, intentionally burning Rome, and other ridiculous things, a lot of evidence shows that Nero was not unpopular with the people. He clashed with the Senate and wealthy elites because they wanted to maintain their wealth, but the Roman Empire could no longer be governed like a city state-- taxes had to be raised, and soldiers sent to defend land. The government had difficulty defending its vast territory from the many “barbarian” tribes moving into Roman lands.
Octavian's (Augustus) daughter Julia, Public Domain
|
Agrippina the Elder, Wikimedia Commons
|
Claudia Octavia, Wikimedia Commons
|
Boudicca, Wikimedia Commons
Boudicca of Britain: In 60 CE, half a world away, an Iceni queen on the island of Britain, Boudicca, took up the mantle of warrior for her people, a woman who makes Xena Warrior Princess look like a pacifist.
The Iceni had once welcomed the Romans, seeing them as a powerful, and potentially beneficial ally during the early expeditions by Caesar. However, in the later colonial efforts, the Romans made a number of enemies among the tribe of Britain, including those who had offered alliances to Caesar in the years before by forcing them into economic and political arrangements that only benefited Rome. Increased oppression over the years would lead to a number of rebellions, large and small, but none created such fear as Boudicca’s.
When her husband died, he left behind a will that named the Roman emperor co-heir with his two teenage daughters. His hope had been that this would protect his people by maintaining some of their power, but also please Rome by giving them a piece of it as well. However, Rome had no interest in obeying the will of a dead king, and claimed the entirety of the tribe’s lands as their own.
Soon the Romans showed up to take their lands, and when Boudicca objected, she was mercilessly flogged in front of her people. Far worse, her daughters were dragged in front of her and raped. Boudicca rose up and avenged her own family, as well as her tribal family. She gained support from surrounding tribes who banded together to free themselves from “the Roman menace.” Some argued that she used false omens and potentially even witchcraft to convince others to follow her, though that comes mainly from Roman historians–the invention of conspiracy theories, perhaps? Thanks a lot Romans!
Soon she led her united tribal armies against Roman colonial towns. Brutality was clearly not just a Roman tactic, as her armies were known to brutalize the population, even burning down a Roman temple with hundreds inside. Her pattern of success seemed marked by a blaze of glory as she destroyed multiple Roman and Roman-allied towns, to the point that Roman officials had no choice but to attack.
10,000 Romans confronted Boudicca and her people at an unknown location. When they met, she supposedly had an army of 230,000, though it is quite clear that this an example of inflation to make Rome’s military look unbelievably superior. It is very likely that Boudicca had the larger force, but many of her forces would be undertrained or ill-equipped compared to professional Roman forces. Still, it is said that Boudicca’s forces consisted of men and women, young and old, following her and her daughters’ carriage into battle. According to Tacitus, she rode in front of her people on a chariot with her daughters, “avenging, not, as a queen of glorious ancestry, her ravished realm and power, but, as a woman of the people, her liberty lost, her body tortured by the lash, the tarnished honour of her daughters. Roman cupidity had progressed so far that not their very persons, not age itself, nor maidenhood, were left unpolluted."
Unfortunately, her forces would be routed by the Roman legionaries, and Boudicca, like Cleopatra, would choose suicide over capture. She still remains a symbol of freedom, unity, and courage in British culture. Her statue stands, ironically, in the very city she burned down: London.
The Iceni had once welcomed the Romans, seeing them as a powerful, and potentially beneficial ally during the early expeditions by Caesar. However, in the later colonial efforts, the Romans made a number of enemies among the tribe of Britain, including those who had offered alliances to Caesar in the years before by forcing them into economic and political arrangements that only benefited Rome. Increased oppression over the years would lead to a number of rebellions, large and small, but none created such fear as Boudicca’s.
When her husband died, he left behind a will that named the Roman emperor co-heir with his two teenage daughters. His hope had been that this would protect his people by maintaining some of their power, but also please Rome by giving them a piece of it as well. However, Rome had no interest in obeying the will of a dead king, and claimed the entirety of the tribe’s lands as their own.
Soon the Romans showed up to take their lands, and when Boudicca objected, she was mercilessly flogged in front of her people. Far worse, her daughters were dragged in front of her and raped. Boudicca rose up and avenged her own family, as well as her tribal family. She gained support from surrounding tribes who banded together to free themselves from “the Roman menace.” Some argued that she used false omens and potentially even witchcraft to convince others to follow her, though that comes mainly from Roman historians–the invention of conspiracy theories, perhaps? Thanks a lot Romans!
Soon she led her united tribal armies against Roman colonial towns. Brutality was clearly not just a Roman tactic, as her armies were known to brutalize the population, even burning down a Roman temple with hundreds inside. Her pattern of success seemed marked by a blaze of glory as she destroyed multiple Roman and Roman-allied towns, to the point that Roman officials had no choice but to attack.
10,000 Romans confronted Boudicca and her people at an unknown location. When they met, she supposedly had an army of 230,000, though it is quite clear that this an example of inflation to make Rome’s military look unbelievably superior. It is very likely that Boudicca had the larger force, but many of her forces would be undertrained or ill-equipped compared to professional Roman forces. Still, it is said that Boudicca’s forces consisted of men and women, young and old, following her and her daughters’ carriage into battle. According to Tacitus, she rode in front of her people on a chariot with her daughters, “avenging, not, as a queen of glorious ancestry, her ravished realm and power, but, as a woman of the people, her liberty lost, her body tortured by the lash, the tarnished honour of her daughters. Roman cupidity had progressed so far that not their very persons, not age itself, nor maidenhood, were left unpolluted."
Unfortunately, her forces would be routed by the Roman legionaries, and Boudicca, like Cleopatra, would choose suicide over capture. She still remains a symbol of freedom, unity, and courage in British culture. Her statue stands, ironically, in the very city she burned down: London.
Zenobia in Chains, Public Domain
Zenobia of the Middle East: Boudicca would not be the only leader to challenge Rome. Zenobia was queen of the Palmyrene Empire, formed as a breakaway kingdom from the Roman Empire amid power struggles in the Third Century CE. Unlike Boudicca, who charged at Rome headfirst, Zenobia cleverly played loyal and constructed an expansive empire right under their nose, until her power could no longer be ignored.
Born into a Roman province, Zenobia was a Roman citizen and possibly had ties to prominent, historic Roman families. However, she would proclaim that she was a descendant of Hellenistic royalty, including Cleopatra and Dido. Long before she came to power, she played a principal role at her family farm, where Arabic histories indicate that she developed her characteristic stamina, equestrian skills, and her experience in leading men.
She would later be married to the Roman governor of Syria from the city of Palmyra, which was an important trade center on the Silk Road where merchants had to pay taxes both on their way to and from Rome. Yet, with increasing incursions by the Parthian Empire, the Romans attempted to reassert their authority and reconquer their territories in the region, which failed epically until Zenobia’s husband, Odaenthus, marched against the Persians and reinstated Roman rule. He was rewarded with governorship of the whole eastern portion of the empire.
Odaenthus became more and more powerful, however, around 266 CE he was assassinated by his nephew. Some ancient historians hinted that Zenobia herself was behind the assassination. Zenobia's son inherited the throne, but because he was still a child, she ruled in his place.
Palmyra had a solid relationship with Rome at the time, and Odaenthus was even considered a possible successor for the emperor. Initially, Zenobia saw the same potential for herself and her son, but as the chaos of the Crisis of the Third Century continued, she decided not to wait. In 269 CE, she sent her army into Roman Egypt and claimed it as her own, but cleverly did so under the guise of putting down a local revolt, and thereby looking like she was doing so in favor of Rome. Contemporary historians contended that she sent instigators to start the revolt. She not only gained control of Egypt, but soon the areas of the Levant and parts of Asia Minor, all while proclaiming loyalty to Rome. Only five years into her rule as regent, and two years after her conquest of Egypt, she created an empire that began to rival the two major powers to either side of her: the Roman and Persian Empires, but neither seemed to even realize what she was doing.
When Aurelian became emperor, he was a military man who was intent on bringing order back to Rome through force. He turned on Zenobia’s blooming empire in 272CE, destroying everything in his path. Cities soon surrendered to him before he even reached them to ensure their safety. Zenobia tried to reach the emperor and assure him of her (questionable) loyalty, but he didn't respond and in his silence, she raised her army in preparation for battle.
Unfortunately for the warrior queen, Aurelian’s forces slaughtered hers, not only at the Battle of Immae, but again outside of Emesa where Zenobia had retreated to regroup.. Though defeated, this is not to say her and her people didn’t put up quite a fight in the process. Aurelian wrote, “It cannot be told what a store of arrows is here, what great preparations for war, what a store of spears and of stones; there is no section of the wall that is not held by two or three engines of war, and their machines can even hurl fire. Why say more? She fears like a woman, and fights as one who fears punishment. I believe, however, that the gods will truly bring aid to the Roman commonwealth, for they have never failed our endeavors."
She and her son, after one more attempt at a stand near the capital, fled toward Persia. The skilled equestrians had outpaced his pursuing cavalry for some time, but was ultimately caught trying to cross the Euphrates River, and was brought back to Rome.
Her fate is questionable. Some historians have claimed she was paraded through the capital city, as many prisoners had been, chained and publicly shamed. Some proclaim that she died on the way to Rome, varying from being executed or committing suicide to evade capture. Others say she was put on trial in Rome, but was ultimately acquitted when claiming that she was innocent and simply misled by advisors. Others still say that she was not only acquitted, but actually married a prominent Roman and had a daughter who was later married to Aurelian himself. Get it straight, Antiquity!
While she may or may not have met a noble end fitting for the warrior queen that she was, Zenobia, like the other leading women of the ancient world, had proven her ability to weather the hardships and consequences of war. Historians described her as being a leader who worked her soldiers hard, and could out-hunt and out-drink any one of them. More modern historians have analyzed that she had deftly used the stereotypes of her gender both in her methods of building her empire and possibly in her trial after the fact (if that ever happened), allowing the men around her to assume she was weaker or more naïve than she truly was. In doing so, she created a powerful army and empire, that while short-lived, was one of her own creation, and her authority became a primary target of the greatest empire of the ancient world. Zenobia became one of the most iconic, though under appreciated figures of the ancient world. Let’s reinstall her in her proper, impressive place.
Born into a Roman province, Zenobia was a Roman citizen and possibly had ties to prominent, historic Roman families. However, she would proclaim that she was a descendant of Hellenistic royalty, including Cleopatra and Dido. Long before she came to power, she played a principal role at her family farm, where Arabic histories indicate that she developed her characteristic stamina, equestrian skills, and her experience in leading men.
She would later be married to the Roman governor of Syria from the city of Palmyra, which was an important trade center on the Silk Road where merchants had to pay taxes both on their way to and from Rome. Yet, with increasing incursions by the Parthian Empire, the Romans attempted to reassert their authority and reconquer their territories in the region, which failed epically until Zenobia’s husband, Odaenthus, marched against the Persians and reinstated Roman rule. He was rewarded with governorship of the whole eastern portion of the empire.
Odaenthus became more and more powerful, however, around 266 CE he was assassinated by his nephew. Some ancient historians hinted that Zenobia herself was behind the assassination. Zenobia's son inherited the throne, but because he was still a child, she ruled in his place.
Palmyra had a solid relationship with Rome at the time, and Odaenthus was even considered a possible successor for the emperor. Initially, Zenobia saw the same potential for herself and her son, but as the chaos of the Crisis of the Third Century continued, she decided not to wait. In 269 CE, she sent her army into Roman Egypt and claimed it as her own, but cleverly did so under the guise of putting down a local revolt, and thereby looking like she was doing so in favor of Rome. Contemporary historians contended that she sent instigators to start the revolt. She not only gained control of Egypt, but soon the areas of the Levant and parts of Asia Minor, all while proclaiming loyalty to Rome. Only five years into her rule as regent, and two years after her conquest of Egypt, she created an empire that began to rival the two major powers to either side of her: the Roman and Persian Empires, but neither seemed to even realize what she was doing.
When Aurelian became emperor, he was a military man who was intent on bringing order back to Rome through force. He turned on Zenobia’s blooming empire in 272CE, destroying everything in his path. Cities soon surrendered to him before he even reached them to ensure their safety. Zenobia tried to reach the emperor and assure him of her (questionable) loyalty, but he didn't respond and in his silence, she raised her army in preparation for battle.
Unfortunately for the warrior queen, Aurelian’s forces slaughtered hers, not only at the Battle of Immae, but again outside of Emesa where Zenobia had retreated to regroup.. Though defeated, this is not to say her and her people didn’t put up quite a fight in the process. Aurelian wrote, “It cannot be told what a store of arrows is here, what great preparations for war, what a store of spears and of stones; there is no section of the wall that is not held by two or three engines of war, and their machines can even hurl fire. Why say more? She fears like a woman, and fights as one who fears punishment. I believe, however, that the gods will truly bring aid to the Roman commonwealth, for they have never failed our endeavors."
She and her son, after one more attempt at a stand near the capital, fled toward Persia. The skilled equestrians had outpaced his pursuing cavalry for some time, but was ultimately caught trying to cross the Euphrates River, and was brought back to Rome.
Her fate is questionable. Some historians have claimed she was paraded through the capital city, as many prisoners had been, chained and publicly shamed. Some proclaim that she died on the way to Rome, varying from being executed or committing suicide to evade capture. Others say she was put on trial in Rome, but was ultimately acquitted when claiming that she was innocent and simply misled by advisors. Others still say that she was not only acquitted, but actually married a prominent Roman and had a daughter who was later married to Aurelian himself. Get it straight, Antiquity!
While she may or may not have met a noble end fitting for the warrior queen that she was, Zenobia, like the other leading women of the ancient world, had proven her ability to weather the hardships and consequences of war. Historians described her as being a leader who worked her soldiers hard, and could out-hunt and out-drink any one of them. More modern historians have analyzed that she had deftly used the stereotypes of her gender both in her methods of building her empire and possibly in her trial after the fact (if that ever happened), allowing the men around her to assume she was weaker or more naïve than she truly was. In doing so, she created a powerful army and empire, that while short-lived, was one of her own creation, and her authority became a primary target of the greatest empire of the ancient world. Zenobia became one of the most iconic, though under appreciated figures of the ancient world. Let’s reinstall her in her proper, impressive place.
Women in Roman Empire, Public Domain
Conclusion: Inside and outside the Roman Empire, women existed and participated in the issues of the time. Women labored in the domestic sphere as homemakers and mothers, in markets, were prostitutes, slaves, and jockeyed for power. Women also played prominent roles in securing and challenging the empire. These women rose to power amid the restrictions and expectations of their societies. While these outliers are known, many thousands of female leaders have been lost to time. If they would only make a Back to the Future reboot, we could take the Delorean back there and figure some of this out!
In many ways the Han Empire was similar to the Roman Empire. Compare and contrast these empires with Women and the Han Empire. What more can we learn about these women? How did the layers of class and region change their experiences? Why are these women symbolic of their time or region? What lessons do their stories hold for female leadership in the centuries to come?
In many ways the Han Empire was similar to the Roman Empire. Compare and contrast these empires with Women and the Han Empire. What more can we learn about these women? How did the layers of class and region change their experiences? Why are these women symbolic of their time or region? What lessons do their stories hold for female leadership in the centuries to come?
Draw your own conclusions
|
Learn how to teach with inquiry.
Many of these lesson plans were sponsored in part by the Library of Congress Teaching with Primary Sources Eastern Region Program, coordinated by Waynesburg University, the History and Social Studies Education Faculty at Plymouth State University, and the Patrons of the Remedial Herstory Project. |
|
Public Domain
|
Why did women resist empire?
Women in the ancient world took up arms to fight empires. Despite all the gender barriers women crossed the gendered threshold into a man's world? Why? In this inquiry there are four examples of women who resisted empire in Rome and the Han and Wu empires in China. Why did they do it? 
| ||
|
How did the founding myth of Rome establish gender norms?
In this inquiry, students explore the the primary material for the founding myths of Rome and try to uncover what these stories, in which women are central, tell us about women's place in Roman society.
| ||
Hippocrates, Wikimedia Commons
|
How were women’s bodies treated in healthcare?
In this inquiry, students explore Greek ideas about women's bodies and how those ideas impacted women's lives for millennia to come.
| ||
Wikimedia Commons
|
How were women treated in this culture? WEBQUEST
Measuring a culture by how they treat women is a great way to help students better understand society and time periods. Let the students become the historian and determine how "advanced" the society was. The following Webquest requires students to have access to the internet. On whatever time period or culture you are learning about in a World History, Geography, or Cultures class, ask students to look for articles that answer these questions, and ultimately let students decide how they treated their women.
| ||
Lesson Plans from Other Organizations
- This website, Women in World History has primary source based lesson plans on women's history in a whole range of topics. Some are free while others have a cost.
- The Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media has produced recommendations for teaching women's history with primary sources and provided a collection of sources for world history. Check them out!
- The Stanford History Education Group has a number of lesson plans about women in World History.
Women in Roman Myths
Livy: The rape of Rhea Silvia by Mars
This story is from the History of Rome, a text dating to around 29 BCE. The story follows Amulius’ attempts to secure his power after overthrowing his brother and the rescue of Romulus and Remus by a she-wolf.
Amulius drove out his brother and ruled in his stead. Adding crime to crime, he destroyed Numitor's male issue; and Rhea Silvia, his brother's daughter, he appointed a Vestal under pretense of honouring her, and by consigning her to perpetual virginity, deprived her of the hope of children. But the Fates were resolved, as I suppose, upon the founding of this great City, and the beginning of the mightiest of empires, next after that of Heaven. The Vestal was ravished, and having given birth to twin sons, named Mars as the father of her doubtful offspring, whether actually so believing, or because it seemed less wrong if a god were the author of her fault. But neither gods nor men protected the mother herself or her babes from the king's cruelty; the priestess he ordered to be manacled and cast into prison, the children to be committed to the river. It happened by singular good fortune that the Tiber having spread beyond its banks into stagnant pools afforded nowhere any access to the regular channel of the river, and the men who brought the twins were led to hope that being infants they might be drowned, no matter how sluggish the stream. So they made shift to discharge the king’s command, by exposing the babes at the nearest point of the overflow, where the fig-tree Ruminalis—formerly, they say, called Romularis—now stands. In those days this was a wild and uninhabited region. The story persists that when the floating basket in which the children had been exposed was left high and dry by the receding water, a she-wolf, coming down out of the surrounding hills to slake her thirst, turned her steps towards the cry of the infants, and with her teats gave them suck so gently, that the keeper of the royal flock found her licking them with her tongue.
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 4. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
Amulius drove out his brother and ruled in his stead. Adding crime to crime, he destroyed Numitor's male issue; and Rhea Silvia, his brother's daughter, he appointed a Vestal under pretense of honouring her, and by consigning her to perpetual virginity, deprived her of the hope of children. But the Fates were resolved, as I suppose, upon the founding of this great City, and the beginning of the mightiest of empires, next after that of Heaven. The Vestal was ravished, and having given birth to twin sons, named Mars as the father of her doubtful offspring, whether actually so believing, or because it seemed less wrong if a god were the author of her fault. But neither gods nor men protected the mother herself or her babes from the king's cruelty; the priestess he ordered to be manacled and cast into prison, the children to be committed to the river. It happened by singular good fortune that the Tiber having spread beyond its banks into stagnant pools afforded nowhere any access to the regular channel of the river, and the men who brought the twins were led to hope that being infants they might be drowned, no matter how sluggish the stream. So they made shift to discharge the king’s command, by exposing the babes at the nearest point of the overflow, where the fig-tree Ruminalis—formerly, they say, called Romularis—now stands. In those days this was a wild and uninhabited region. The story persists that when the floating basket in which the children had been exposed was left high and dry by the receding water, a she-wolf, coming down out of the surrounding hills to slake her thirst, turned her steps towards the cry of the infants, and with her teats gave them suck so gently, that the keeper of the royal flock found her licking them with her tongue.
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 4. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
- How are women depicted in this source?
- How is the rape of "the Vestal" portrayed?
Livy: The abduction of the Sabine womeN
Another story from Livy’s History of Rome, this text details the abduction of the Sabine women. Play close attention to the mention of marriage rites and the way women are described.
When the hour for the games had come, and their eyes and minds were alike riveted on the spectacle before them, the preconcerted signal was given and the Roman youth dashed in all directions to carry off the maidens who were present. The larger part were carried off indiscriminately, but some particularly beautiful girls who had been marked out for the leading patricians were carried to their houses by plebeians told off for the task. One, conspicuous amongst them all for grace and beauty, is reported to have been carried off by a group led by a certain Talassius, and to the many inquiries as to whom she was intended for, the invariable answer was given, ‘For Talassius.’ Hence the use of this word in the marriage rites. Alarm and consternation broke up the games, and the parents of the maidens fled, distracted with grief, uttering bitter reproaches on the violators of the laws of hospitality and appealing to the god to whose solemn games they had come, only to be the victims of impious perfidy.
The abducted maidens were quite as despondent and indignant. Romulus, however, went round in person, and pointed out to them that it was all owing to the pride of their parents in denying right of intermarriage to their neighbours. They would live in honourable wedlock, and share all their property and civil rights, and —dearest of all to human nature-would be the mothers of freemen. He begged them to lay aside their feelings of resentment and give their affections to those whom fortune had made masters of their persons. An injury had often led to reconciliation and love; they would find their husbands all the more affectionate because each would do his utmost, so far as in him lay to make up for the loss of parents and country. These arguments were reinforced by the endearments of their husbands who excused their conduct by pleading the irresistible force of their passion —a plea effective beyond all others in appealing to a woman's nature.
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 9. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
When the hour for the games had come, and their eyes and minds were alike riveted on the spectacle before them, the preconcerted signal was given and the Roman youth dashed in all directions to carry off the maidens who were present. The larger part were carried off indiscriminately, but some particularly beautiful girls who had been marked out for the leading patricians were carried to their houses by plebeians told off for the task. One, conspicuous amongst them all for grace and beauty, is reported to have been carried off by a group led by a certain Talassius, and to the many inquiries as to whom she was intended for, the invariable answer was given, ‘For Talassius.’ Hence the use of this word in the marriage rites. Alarm and consternation broke up the games, and the parents of the maidens fled, distracted with grief, uttering bitter reproaches on the violators of the laws of hospitality and appealing to the god to whose solemn games they had come, only to be the victims of impious perfidy.
The abducted maidens were quite as despondent and indignant. Romulus, however, went round in person, and pointed out to them that it was all owing to the pride of their parents in denying right of intermarriage to their neighbours. They would live in honourable wedlock, and share all their property and civil rights, and —dearest of all to human nature-would be the mothers of freemen. He begged them to lay aside their feelings of resentment and give their affections to those whom fortune had made masters of their persons. An injury had often led to reconciliation and love; they would find their husbands all the more affectionate because each would do his utmost, so far as in him lay to make up for the loss of parents and country. These arguments were reinforced by the endearments of their husbands who excused their conduct by pleading the irresistible force of their passion —a plea effective beyond all others in appealing to a woman's nature.
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 9. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
- How does this document describe the abduction of the Sabine women?
- Why is this description significant?
- What does this tell us about how this founding myth established gender norms?
Livy: The intervention of the Sabine women
Our final extract from Livy’s History of Rome describes how the Sabine women intervened in the war and called for peace.
They went boldly into the midst of the flying missiles with disheveled hair and rent garments. Running across the space between the two armies they tried to stop any further fighting and calm the excited passions by appealing to their fathers in the one army and their husbands in the other not to bring upon themselves a curse by staining their hands with the blood of a father-in-law or a son-in-law, nor upon their posterity the taint of parricide. "If," they cried, "you are weary of these ties of kindred, these marriage-bonds, then turn your anger upon us; it is we who are the cause of the war, it is we who have wounded and slain our husbands and fathers. Better for us to perish rather than live without one or the other of you, as widows or as orphans."
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 13. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
They went boldly into the midst of the flying missiles with disheveled hair and rent garments. Running across the space between the two armies they tried to stop any further fighting and calm the excited passions by appealing to their fathers in the one army and their husbands in the other not to bring upon themselves a curse by staining their hands with the blood of a father-in-law or a son-in-law, nor upon their posterity the taint of parricide. "If," they cried, "you are weary of these ties of kindred, these marriage-bonds, then turn your anger upon us; it is we who are the cause of the war, it is we who have wounded and slain our husbands and fathers. Better for us to perish rather than live without one or the other of you, as widows or as orphans."
Livy, History of Rome, Book 1. Chapter 13. Translation by Foster. B. O (1919) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions
- Why was this speech important?
- How are women portrayed in this document?
Women and Healthcare
Hippocrates: Diseases of Women 1
Diseases of Women is a collection of writings by the classical Greek author, Hippocrates, on gynecology. Hippocrates is often regarded as the father of modern medicine. The document below describes the Hippocratic understanding of why women experienced a menstrual bleed and how a woman might avoid menstrual issues.
Since in a woman who has not given birth, the body is not accustomed to being filled up (sc. with blood), but is robust, solider and denser than if she had experienced the lochia, and her uterus has not been dilated, her menstrual flow will be accompanied by more pain, and more troubles will be present: i.e., her menses will be obstructed when she has not given birth. This is so for the reason I first indicated when I contended that a woman is more porous and softer than a man; this being so, a woman’s body draws what is being exhaled from her cavity more quickly and in a greater amount than does a man’s...
Also, because a woman’s flesh is softer, when her body fills up with blood, unless the blood is then discharged from her body, the filling and warming, of their tissues that ensue will provoke pain: for a woman has hotter blood, and for this reason she herself is hotter than a man; if, however, most the blood that was added is subsequently discharged, no pain will arise from it. A man, having solider flesh than a woman, will never overfill with so much blood that, unless some it is discharged each month, he feels pain, and besides he takes in only as much (sc. blood) as is necessary for the nourishment his body, and his body—lacking softness as it does—is never overstretched or heated by fullness as a woman’s is. A great amount this is also due in a man to his exerting himself physically more than a woman, which consumes a part of the exhalation (sc. rising from his food).
Now when, in a woman who has not given birth, the menses fail to appear and cannot find their way out, a disease arises, and this happens if the mouth the uterus is closed or folded over, or some part the vagina has become constricted; for if any these things happens, the menses will be unable to find their way out until the uterus returns to a natural healthy state. This disease generally occurs in whose uterus has a narrow mouth or neck lying further forward into the vagina. For if either these be the case, and the woman does not have intercourse with her husband, and her cavity is more empty than it should be as the result of some disease, the uterus turns aside. For it has no moistness of its own, since the woman is not having intercourse, and there is an open space for it since the cavity is too empty, so that it turns aside because it is drier and lighter than it should be. And sometimes as it turns aside its mouth becomes displaced too far to one side because its neck is lying too far into the vagina. For if the uterus is moist as the result of intercourse and the cavity is not empty, it is not likely to turn aside. This is why the uterus closes as the result of a woman not having intercourse.
Hippocrates, Diseases of Women, Book 1. Translation by Potter. P (2018) London: Loeb Classical Library.
Questions:
- Based off this document, what does Hippocrates believe the relationship between sex and menstruation to be?
- What misogynistic (fearful or hateful) ideas about women can you find in this document?
- What can you infer about Hippocrates perception of women and menstruation?
soranus of Ephesus: Gynecology
Soranus of Ephesus was a Greek gynecologist who commented on women’s diseases and childbearing. His work also features a 2nd century BCE understanding of menstrual cycles and what is now known as amenorrhea (an absence of menstruation).
Now of those who do not menstruate, some have no ailment and it is physiological for them not to menstruate: either because of their age (as in those too young or on the contrary too old) or because they are pregnant, or mannish, or barren singers and athletes in whom nothing is left over for menstruation, everything being consumed by the exercises or changed into tissue. Others, however, do not menstruate because of a disease of the uterus, or of the rest of the body, or of both: “of the uterus” if the condition of so-called imperforation is present, or callosity, or scirrhus, or inflammation, or a scar has formed on a sore, or a closure of the orifice (from long widowhood among other causes).
Soranus of Ephesus, Gynecology. Translation by Temkin. O (1956) Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press
Questions:
- Based off this document, what does Soranus of Ephesus believe a lack of menstruation to be caused by? Do any of those reasons seem inaccurate? Why or why not?
- What misogynistic (fearful or hateful) ideas about women can you find in this document?
- What can you infer about Soranus of Ephesus's perception of women and menstruation?
Pliny the Elder: Natural History
Pliny the Elder was a Roman author and philosopher most notably known for his work ‘Natural History’. In the following text, Pliny discusses the dangers of menstrual blood.
“But it is not easy that anything should be discovered that is more monstrous than woman’s menstrual fluid. New wine turns sour by coming near it, crops that are touched become barren, grafts whither, seeds of the garden dry up, fruit of trees by which she sits falls off, the brightness of mirrors are dimmed by reflecting her, the edge of iron is dulled, the brightness of ivory, beehives die, bronze and even iron are seized by rust, and the air is seized by an awful smell. Dogs become rabid by tasting it and their bite is infected by an incurable poison. In fact, bitumen, too, which has an otherwise pliable and sticky nature and which floats at certain times of the year on the lake of Judaea, which is called Asphaltites, is not able to be divided up, as it sticks to everything it makes contact with, except a thread which is infected with this slime. Also ants, the tiniest animal, and sensitive to its presence, reject the tasty fruit which it was carrying never to return to it again.”
Coughlin, S. (2022). Aristotle on menstruating women and mirrors — Ancient Medicine. [online] Ancient Medicine. Available at: <https://www.ancientmedicine.org/home/2020/7/26/aristotle-on-menstruating-women-and-mirrors> [Accessed 14 October 2022].
Questions:
“But it is not easy that anything should be discovered that is more monstrous than woman’s menstrual fluid. New wine turns sour by coming near it, crops that are touched become barren, grafts whither, seeds of the garden dry up, fruit of trees by which she sits falls off, the brightness of mirrors are dimmed by reflecting her, the edge of iron is dulled, the brightness of ivory, beehives die, bronze and even iron are seized by rust, and the air is seized by an awful smell. Dogs become rabid by tasting it and their bite is infected by an incurable poison. In fact, bitumen, too, which has an otherwise pliable and sticky nature and which floats at certain times of the year on the lake of Judaea, which is called Asphaltites, is not able to be divided up, as it sticks to everything it makes contact with, except a thread which is infected with this slime. Also ants, the tiniest animal, and sensitive to its presence, reject the tasty fruit which it was carrying never to return to it again.”
Coughlin, S. (2022). Aristotle on menstruating women and mirrors — Ancient Medicine. [online] Ancient Medicine. Available at: <https://www.ancientmedicine.org/home/2020/7/26/aristotle-on-menstruating-women-and-mirrors> [Accessed 14 October 2022].
Questions:
- What does Pliny the Elder believe that menstruation blood does?
- What misogynistic (fearful or hateful) ideas about women can you find in this document?
- What can you infer about Pliny the Elder's perception of women and menstruation?
Sotira: Efficacy of Menstrual Fluid
Although little is known about Sotira, we believe she was a Roman midwife. Her work now only exists in small fragments. The following document discusses the magical properties of menstrual fluid.
“To anoint the soles of the patient's feet with menstrual fluid is the most efficacious cure for tertian and quartan malaria; it is much more effective if it is done by the woman herself without the patient's knowledge. The same remedy also awakens an epileptic.”
Tan. D. A, Haththotuwa. R, Fraser. I. S (2017) ‘Cultural aspects and mythologies surrounding menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding’ In Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. Amsterdam: Elseiver
Questions:
“To anoint the soles of the patient's feet with menstrual fluid is the most efficacious cure for tertian and quartan malaria; it is much more effective if it is done by the woman herself without the patient's knowledge. The same remedy also awakens an epileptic.”
Tan. D. A, Haththotuwa. R, Fraser. I. S (2017) ‘Cultural aspects and mythologies surrounding menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding’ In Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. Amsterdam: Elseiver
Questions:
- What does Sotira believe that menstruation blood does?
- What can you infer about Sotira's perception of women and menstruation?
Papyrus Ebers
The Papyrus ebers are a group of Egyptian medical texts containing herbal formulas and mythical remedies to cure an array of ailments.
‘If you examine a woman having pain in her stomach while hsmn (meaning menstruation) does not come for her, and you find (. . .), then you shall say concerning it: this is a case of obstruction of the blood in her uterus. If you examine a woman who has spent many years while hsmn does not come for her, she habitually spews up something like water, her stomach being like that which is under fire, but it stops when she has spewed up, then you shall say concerning it: this is an accumulation of blood in her uterus because she is bewitched. If you examine a woman having pain in one side of her vulva, you should say concerning it: this means that her hsmn has lost its regularity. When it (i.e., the hsmn) has started, you shall make for her: smashed garlic, cider and sawdust of fir tree. Her pubic region is to be bandaged with it’
This short text is also an extract from the Papyrus Ebers and discusses some medicinal use of menstrual blood.
“sagging breasts should be covered with menstrual blood, and the woman's belly and her thighs should be covered as well”
Frandsen. P. J (2007) ‘The Menstrual “Taboo” in Ancient Egypt’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp.81-206. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Questions:
‘If you examine a woman having pain in her stomach while hsmn (meaning menstruation) does not come for her, and you find (. . .), then you shall say concerning it: this is a case of obstruction of the blood in her uterus. If you examine a woman who has spent many years while hsmn does not come for her, she habitually spews up something like water, her stomach being like that which is under fire, but it stops when she has spewed up, then you shall say concerning it: this is an accumulation of blood in her uterus because she is bewitched. If you examine a woman having pain in one side of her vulva, you should say concerning it: this means that her hsmn has lost its regularity. When it (i.e., the hsmn) has started, you shall make for her: smashed garlic, cider and sawdust of fir tree. Her pubic region is to be bandaged with it’
This short text is also an extract from the Papyrus Ebers and discusses some medicinal use of menstrual blood.
“sagging breasts should be covered with menstrual blood, and the woman's belly and her thighs should be covered as well”
Frandsen. P. J (2007) ‘The Menstrual “Taboo” in Ancient Egypt’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp.81-206. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Questions:
- What does this text believe that menstruation blood does?
- What does this text believe about illness related to mensuration?
Hippocrates: Nature of Women
Nature of Women is a text compiled by Hippocratic authors, or students of Hippocrates, on gynecology. Hippocrates is often regarded as the father of modern medicine, which is strange because he wrote in ancient history. In ancient and classical Greece it was believed that the womb could move around freely in the women’s body resulting in medical problems. When we investigate it, this theory is rooted in misogyny with the womb becoming a weakness and procreation often becoming the solution.
Vocabulary:
This is my account of the nature and diseases of women: the most important factor in human affairs is the divine; then the natures of women, and their complexions: for very white women are moister and more subject to fluxes, and dark women are drier and more constricted, whereas wine-colored women have something of both.
The ages of life have the following significance: young women are generally moister and richer in blood, while old women are drier and have less blood: those between the two have something of both. A person who manages these matters correctly must begin from divine factors, and then distinguish the natures of women, their ages, the seasons, and the places where they happen to be; for cold places promote fluxes, while hot ones are drying and constipating.…
If a woman’s uterus moves against her liver, she will suddenly lose her speech, grind her teeth, and take on a livid [furious] coloring—these things befall her suddenly while she is in a healthy state. This happens to unmarried women, especially if they are advanced in age and widowed, but also if they are young and widowed after having had children.
When the case is such, push the uterus down away from the liver, and bind it with a band under the patient’s hypochondria [excessively and unnecessarily worried about being sick]. Open her mouth and pour in very fragrant wine, and hold evil-smelling fumigants under her nostrils and fragrant ones below her uterus. When the woman comes to her senses, have her:
If a woman’s uterus advances and moves outside [the 21st century medical term for this is a “prolapsed uterus,” which can occur after birth]... and irritates her. She suffers these things… after having given birth, she does not sleep with her husband. When the case is such:
If the uterus descends completely out of the genitalia, it hangs like a scrotum, pain occupies the lower abdomen and loins, and when the pain has set in, it (i.e., the uterus) is unwilling to return to its place. This condition comes on when after giving birth a woman strains her uterus, or sleeps with her husband during her lochial flow [bleeding after birth]. When the case is such, cooling compresses must be applied to the genitalia, and the part outside must be cleaned off; boil pomegranate in dark wine, and after washing with this replace the uterus inside, and then inject a mixture of honey and resin.
Hippocrates, Nature of Women, circa 440 and 360 BCE, Translation by Potter. P (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, 2012).
Questions
Vocabulary:
- hypochondria: In Hippocratic medicine the "hypochondria" was the part of the abdomen between the ribs and the navel. Hippocrates is saying to bind the patient there to prevent her uterus squeezing up against her liver. The meaning of this word has changed. Modern day it means excessively and unnecessarily worried about being sick.
- fumigate: use chemicals that produce good smelling fumes for cleansing
- genitalia: sexual organs, in women this includes the vulva, vagina, uterus, fillopian tubes, etc.
- lochia flow: the normal bleeding after giving birth, which usually lasts for six weeks
This is my account of the nature and diseases of women: the most important factor in human affairs is the divine; then the natures of women, and their complexions: for very white women are moister and more subject to fluxes, and dark women are drier and more constricted, whereas wine-colored women have something of both.
The ages of life have the following significance: young women are generally moister and richer in blood, while old women are drier and have less blood: those between the two have something of both. A person who manages these matters correctly must begin from divine factors, and then distinguish the natures of women, their ages, the seasons, and the places where they happen to be; for cold places promote fluxes, while hot ones are drying and constipating.…
If a woman’s uterus moves against her liver, she will suddenly lose her speech, grind her teeth, and take on a livid [furious] coloring—these things befall her suddenly while she is in a healthy state. This happens to unmarried women, especially if they are advanced in age and widowed, but also if they are young and widowed after having had children.
When the case is such, push the uterus down away from the liver, and bind it with a band under the patient’s hypochondria [excessively and unnecessarily worried about being sick]. Open her mouth and pour in very fragrant wine, and hold evil-smelling fumigants under her nostrils and fragrant ones below her uterus. When the woman comes to her senses, have her:
- drink a… medication
- and after that ass’s milk
- and then fumigate [use a chemical that produces fumes] her uterus with fragrant [good smelling] substances
- apply a preparation of buprestis
- and on the next day oil of bitter almonds
- leave two days free, and then flush her uterus with fragrant substances
- on the next day apply pennyroyal
- leave one day free and then fumigate with aromatic [good smelling] herbs.
If a woman’s uterus advances and moves outside [the 21st century medical term for this is a “prolapsed uterus,” which can occur after birth]... and irritates her. She suffers these things… after having given birth, she does not sleep with her husband. When the case is such:
- boil myrtle and the sawdust of nettle-tree wood in water
- set this out in the open air, and have the patient pour it as cold as possible onto her genitalia [vulva and vagina]
- also grind this fine and apply it as a plaster.
- Then have her vomit, by drinking lentil water, honey and vinegar, until her uterus is restored to its natural position.
- Positioning her bed with the foot end higher, fumigate beneath her genitalia with evil-smelling substances, and under her nostrils with fragrant ones.
- Have her employ foods that are very mild and cold, drink dilute white wine, and without having a bath sleep with her husband.
If the uterus descends completely out of the genitalia, it hangs like a scrotum, pain occupies the lower abdomen and loins, and when the pain has set in, it (i.e., the uterus) is unwilling to return to its place. This condition comes on when after giving birth a woman strains her uterus, or sleeps with her husband during her lochial flow [bleeding after birth]. When the case is such, cooling compresses must be applied to the genitalia, and the part outside must be cleaned off; boil pomegranate in dark wine, and after washing with this replace the uterus inside, and then inject a mixture of honey and resin.
Hippocrates, Nature of Women, circa 440 and 360 BCE, Translation by Potter. P (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, 2012).
Questions
- Based off this text, how is age believed to impact women's health?
- What do you think of some of the Hippocratic author’s prescribed solutions? Why?
- Examine the underlined text. Here the Hippocratic author blames women for having a prolapsed uterus, a rare, serious, and painful medical condition where the uterus falls out after birth. What does he accuse them of doing?
- Why might beliefs placing blame on women for their painful conditions be dangerous for women?
Hippocrates: Diseases of Young Girls
Yet another of Hippocrates works, Diseases of Young Girls focuses on the treatment of young girls after puberty. Again, we see this idea of women as the ‘weaker’ sex and the decision not to marry as the cause of their illnesses.
Vocabulary:
[C]oncerning terrors of the sort that people fear so strongly, that they are beside themselves and seem to see certain hostile spirits, sometimes by night, sometimes by day, and sometimes at both times… as a result of this kind of vision, many have already hanged themselves, more women than men, for female nature is weaker and more troublesome.
Young girls of an age for marriage, who remain unmarried, suffer this especially at the time of the descent of their menses [period]. Before puberty they were healthy. Afterwards blood is gathered into their wombs for evacuation. Yet, when the mouth of the exit is not opened and more blood flows in due to their nourishment and the increase of their body, then the blood, not having a way to flow out, rushes from the quantity towards the heart and the diaphragm. When these parts are filled, the heart becomes numb; then lethargy [laziness] seizes them after the numbness, then after the lethargy, madness seizes them… When these things occur in this way, the young girl is mad from the intensity of the inflammation; she turns murderous from the putrefaction; she feels fears and terrors from the darkness. From the pressure around the heart, these young girls long for nooses. Their spirit, distraught and sorely troubled by the foulness of their blood, attracts bad things, but names something else, even fearful things. They command the young girl to wander about, to cast herself into wells, and to hang herself, as if these actions were preferable and completely useful. Even when without visions, a certain pleasure exists, as a result of which she longs for death, as if something good.
When the female is recovering her senses, the women dedicate to Artemis many other things and especially expensive female clothing at the orders of the goddess's priests. But the women are being deceived. Release from this comes whenever there is no impediment for the flowing out of the blood. I urge, then whenever young girls suffer this kind of malady [sickness] they should as quickly as possible… become pregnant, they become healthy. If not, either at the same moment as puberty, or later, she will be caught by this sickness, if not by another
Hippocrates, Peri Parthenion (Diseases of Young Girls). Translated by Flemming. R, Hanson. A. E. (Leiden:Brill, 1998).
Guiding Questions
Vocabulary:
- menses: period
- womb: uterus
- diaphragm: part of their lungs
- lethargy: laziness
- malady: sickness
[C]oncerning terrors of the sort that people fear so strongly, that they are beside themselves and seem to see certain hostile spirits, sometimes by night, sometimes by day, and sometimes at both times… as a result of this kind of vision, many have already hanged themselves, more women than men, for female nature is weaker and more troublesome.
Young girls of an age for marriage, who remain unmarried, suffer this especially at the time of the descent of their menses [period]. Before puberty they were healthy. Afterwards blood is gathered into their wombs for evacuation. Yet, when the mouth of the exit is not opened and more blood flows in due to their nourishment and the increase of their body, then the blood, not having a way to flow out, rushes from the quantity towards the heart and the diaphragm. When these parts are filled, the heart becomes numb; then lethargy [laziness] seizes them after the numbness, then after the lethargy, madness seizes them… When these things occur in this way, the young girl is mad from the intensity of the inflammation; she turns murderous from the putrefaction; she feels fears and terrors from the darkness. From the pressure around the heart, these young girls long for nooses. Their spirit, distraught and sorely troubled by the foulness of their blood, attracts bad things, but names something else, even fearful things. They command the young girl to wander about, to cast herself into wells, and to hang herself, as if these actions were preferable and completely useful. Even when without visions, a certain pleasure exists, as a result of which she longs for death, as if something good.
When the female is recovering her senses, the women dedicate to Artemis many other things and especially expensive female clothing at the orders of the goddess's priests. But the women are being deceived. Release from this comes whenever there is no impediment for the flowing out of the blood. I urge, then whenever young girls suffer this kind of malady [sickness] they should as quickly as possible… become pregnant, they become healthy. If not, either at the same moment as puberty, or later, she will be caught by this sickness, if not by another
Hippocrates, Peri Parthenion (Diseases of Young Girls). Translated by Flemming. R, Hanson. A. E. (Leiden:Brill, 1998).
Guiding Questions
- This document is describing a condition called PMS, or premenstrual syndrome. According to the text, what effect does PMS have on women?
- According to the text, who gets PMS?
- What solution does the Hippocratic author prescribe?
Plato: Timaeus
Plato was a classical Greek philosopher born in Athens, Greece. He is remembered for many works, one of these being Timaeus, a dialogue on the nature of human beings. In this extract, Plato compares the natures of men and women.
According to the probable account, all those creatures generated as men who proved themselves cowardly and spent their lives in wrong-doing were transformed, at their second incarnation, into women. And it was for this reason that the gods at that time contrived the love of sexual intercourse by constructing an animate creature of one kind in us men, and of another kind in women; and they made these severally in the following fashion…
Wherefore in men the nature of the genital organs is disobedient and self-willed, like a creature that is deaf to reason, and it attempts to dominate all because of its frenzied lusts. And in women again, owing to the same causes, whenever the matrix or womb, as it is called,—which is an indwelling creature desirous of child-bearing,—remains without fruit long beyond the due season, it is vexed and takes it ill; and by straying all ways through the body and blocking up the passages of the breath and preventing respiration it casts the body into the uttermost distress, and causes, moreover, all kinds of maladies; until the desire and love of the two sexes unite them. Then, culling as it were the fruit from trees, they sow upon the womb, as upon ploughed soil, animalcules [a microscopic animal] that are invisible… mold into shape and nourish to a great size within the body; after which they bring them forth into the light and thus complete the generation of the living creature.
Plato, Timaeus. Critias. Cleitophon. Menexenus. Epistles. circa 5th century BCE. Translated by Bury. R. G. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, 1929.
Questions
According to the probable account, all those creatures generated as men who proved themselves cowardly and spent their lives in wrong-doing were transformed, at their second incarnation, into women. And it was for this reason that the gods at that time contrived the love of sexual intercourse by constructing an animate creature of one kind in us men, and of another kind in women; and they made these severally in the following fashion…
Wherefore in men the nature of the genital organs is disobedient and self-willed, like a creature that is deaf to reason, and it attempts to dominate all because of its frenzied lusts. And in women again, owing to the same causes, whenever the matrix or womb, as it is called,—which is an indwelling creature desirous of child-bearing,—remains without fruit long beyond the due season, it is vexed and takes it ill; and by straying all ways through the body and blocking up the passages of the breath and preventing respiration it casts the body into the uttermost distress, and causes, moreover, all kinds of maladies; until the desire and love of the two sexes unite them. Then, culling as it were the fruit from trees, they sow upon the womb, as upon ploughed soil, animalcules [a microscopic animal] that are invisible… mold into shape and nourish to a great size within the body; after which they bring them forth into the light and thus complete the generation of the living creature.
Plato, Timaeus. Critias. Cleitophon. Menexenus. Epistles. circa 5th century BCE. Translated by Bury. R. G. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, 1929.
Questions
- In this document Plato refers to an “indwelling creature.” What do you suppose that is?
- What does this creature want?
- What happens when the creature doesn’t get it?
Remedial Herstory Editors. "7. 100 BCE- 100 CE WOMEN AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE" The Remedial Herstory Project. April 28, 2023. www.remedialherstory.com.
AUTHOR: |
Jacqui Nelson, MMH
|
Reviewer: |
Dr. Nancy Locklin-Sofer
|
Consulting Team
|
EditorsAmy Flanders
Humanities Teacher, Moultonborough Academy Ron Kaiser Humanities Teacher, Moultonborough Academy Chris Canfield Humanities Teacher, Moultonborough Academy ReviewersAncient:
Dr. Kristin Heineman Professor of History at Colorado State University Dr. Bonnie Rock-McCutcheon Professor of History at Wilson College Sarah Stone PhD Candidate in Religious Studies at Edinburgh University Medieval: Dr. Katherine Koh Professor of History at La Sierra University Dr. Jonathan Couser Professor of History at Plymouth State University Dr. Shahla Haeri Professor of History at Boston University Lauren Cole PhD Candidate in History at Northwestern University Modern: Dr. Jack Gronau Professor of History at Northeastern University |
This sourcebook fully exploits the rich legal material of the imperial period - from Augustus (31 BCE - 14 CE) to the end of the western Roman Empire (476 CE), incorporating both pagan and Christian eras, and explaining the rights women held under Roman law, the restrictions to which they were subject, and legal regulations on marriage, divorce and widowhood.
The story of Agrippina, at the center of imperial power for three generations, is the story of the Julio-Claudia dynasty - and of Rome itself, at its bloody, extravagant, chaotic, ruthless, and political zenith.
A trailblazing, conversation-starting history of women’s health—from the earliest medical ideas about women’s illnesses to hormones and autoimmune diseases—brought together in a fascinating sweeping narrative.
|
|
Senovara, born into the Parisi, a local tribe whose customs have been little changed by Roman rule. But she is also the young wife of Quintus, a veteran of the 6th Legion Victrix. Settling in Quintus's home is both bewildering and awe-inspiring for Senovara as she seeks to adjust to Eboracum's cosmopolitan environment, come to terms with new customs and reconcile their cultural differences.
|
Daughter of Rome, Placidia expects to do her duty to God and country, marry appropriately, and raise imperial heirs. But in AD 410, the city of Rome falls to the Goths, and she must save the tottering Roman Empire from the incompetent hands of her brother. She marries once for love and once for duty, experiencing heartbreaking loss in both.
|
Largely unnoticed by her captors, the one-time Trojan queen Briseis, formerly Achilles' slave, now belonging to his companion Alcimus, quietly takes in these developments. She forges alliances when she can, with Priam's aged wife the defiant Hecuba and with the disgraced soothsayer Calchas, all the while shrewdly seeking her path to revenge.
|
Bibliography
Beard, Mary. SPQR : A History of Ancient Rome. Liverlight paperbacked. New York: Liverlight Publishing Corporation, 2016.
Beard, Mary. Women & Power: A Manifesto. Liveright Publishing Corporation: New York, NY, 2017.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Octavia." Encyclopedia Britannica, November 13, 2019. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Octavia-wife-of-Mark-Antony.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Julia Agrippina." Encyclopedia Britannica, January 1, 2022. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julia-Agrippina.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Julia Daughter of Augustus." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 14, 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julia-daughter-of-Augustus.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Vipsania Agrippina." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 14, 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vipsania-Agrippina.
Clabaugh, Gary K. “A History of Male Attitudes Toward Educating Women.” Educational Horizons. Vol. 64, No. 3, Spring 2010, 166. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ887227.pdf.
Cleghorn, Elinor. Unwell Women: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World. 2021. Dutton: New York: 2021.
Fikes, Robert. “Kandake Amanirenas.” Black Past. May 22, 2019. https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/kandake-amanirenas-10-bc/.
Hinsch, Bret. “The Criticism of Powerful Women by Western Han Dynasty Portent Experts.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 49, no. 1 (2006): 96–121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25165130.
Mead, Rebecca. “How nasty was Nero really?” The New Yorker Magazine. June 14, 2021. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/06/14/how-nasty-was-nero-really.
Roller, Sarah. “6 of Ancient Rome’s Most Powerful Empresses.” History Hit. September 28, 2021. https://www.historyhit.com/ancient-romes-most-powerful-empresses/.
Strayer, R. and Nelson, E., Ways Of The World. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2016.
Beard, Mary. Women & Power: A Manifesto. Liveright Publishing Corporation: New York, NY, 2017.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Octavia." Encyclopedia Britannica, November 13, 2019. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Octavia-wife-of-Mark-Antony.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Julia Agrippina." Encyclopedia Britannica, January 1, 2022. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julia-Agrippina.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Julia Daughter of Augustus." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 14, 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julia-daughter-of-Augustus.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Vipsania Agrippina." Encyclopedia Britannica, October 14, 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vipsania-Agrippina.
Clabaugh, Gary K. “A History of Male Attitudes Toward Educating Women.” Educational Horizons. Vol. 64, No. 3, Spring 2010, 166. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ887227.pdf.
Cleghorn, Elinor. Unwell Women: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World. 2021. Dutton: New York: 2021.
Fikes, Robert. “Kandake Amanirenas.” Black Past. May 22, 2019. https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/kandake-amanirenas-10-bc/.
Hinsch, Bret. “The Criticism of Powerful Women by Western Han Dynasty Portent Experts.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 49, no. 1 (2006): 96–121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25165130.
Mead, Rebecca. “How nasty was Nero really?” The New Yorker Magazine. June 14, 2021. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/06/14/how-nasty-was-nero-really.
Roller, Sarah. “6 of Ancient Rome’s Most Powerful Empresses.” History Hit. September 28, 2021. https://www.historyhit.com/ancient-romes-most-powerful-empresses/.
Strayer, R. and Nelson, E., Ways Of The World. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2016.